Back

Understanding Substance Dependence: What Differentiates Addictive from Non-Addictive Drugs?

Skolnick, J.; Singh, H.; Zhou, H.; Skolnick, S.

2026-05-08 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.05.723067 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Addiction is a global health challenge, yet the molecular features that distinguish addictive from non-addictive drugs remain incompletely understood at the pathway and circuit levels. Here, we present a systematic computational framework that integrates drug-target binding predictions (provided by FINDSITEcomb2.0) with brain-region-specific protein expression to compare addictive and non-addictive compounds. We analyzed 457 addictive and 1,774 non-addictive blood-brain barrier permeable drugs and mapped their predicted targets and associated pathways onto proteins expressed across 120 addiction-relevant brain regions. This analysis reveals widespread convergence between the two classes (addictive and non-addictive drugs) on shared molecular pathways, accompanied by distinct patterns of target and pathway engagement. Functional annotation of differentially engaged targets highlights biases toward plasticity-associated components for addictive drugs. In contrast, non-addictive drugs interact with both plasticity-associated proteins and proteins within the same molecular complex that have addiction suppression, regulatory, and homeostatic functions. Notably, both target classes co-localize within the same addiction-relevant circuits and form an integrated protein-protein interaction network. Together, these results define a differential engagement landscape that links chemical interactions to pathway-level utilization in the brain, revealing molecular features associated with differences in addiction propensity. Significance StatementAddiction is a global health crisis, yet the molecular features that distinguish addictive from non-addictive drugs remain poorly defined. By systematically comparing drug-target and pathway engagement across shared addiction-relevant brain circuits, this study identifies distinct signatures in which addictive compounds preferentially engage plasticity- and stress-associated targets, while non-addictive compounds engage these as well as addiction suppression, regulatory, transport, and metabolic pathways. These results provide a circuit- and pathway-level framework for interpreting addiction liability and guiding the design of safer therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.