Back

The crop pathogen Blumeria hordei exhibits genome-wide pervasive selective and neutral sweepstakes reproduction signatures.

Anderson, M.; Wingen, L. U.; Biggemann Troche, B.; Liu, X.; Mueller, M. C.; Hueckelhoven, R.; Tellier, A.

2026-05-06 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.05.723056 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The fungal crop pathogen Blumeria hordei, causal agent of powdery mildew on barley, presents life-history and epidemiological characteristics, as well as and selective pressures due to modern agriculture leading to expected sweepstakes reproduction, that is highly skewed offspring distributions. Using genome-wide polymorphism data and population genomics inferences, we aim to 1) infer the past demographic history and the strength of sweepstakes reproduction in B. hordei, and 2) quantify the contributions of these selective and neutral processes in the genome. An new inference method based on Neural Posterior Estimation and diversity and linkage disequilibrium statistics was developed and tested on simulated and B. hordei genomic data. We confirm that B. hordei exhibits a moderate sweepstakes reproduction (-parameter of 1.6). We highlight that the Site Frequency Spectrum (SFS) appears sensitive to the joint occurrence of sweepstakes and recent demographic changes, which may caution on the reliability of the SFS to infer sweepstakes reproduction. We then scan the genome for selective sweeps, adjusting the significance thresholds of the methods for demographic history and sweepstakes reproduction, thereby yielding a counterintuitive result. When conditioning the significance threshold for sweep detection on simulations under sweepstakes and demography, a very large number of putatively selected regions is found (11.6% of the genome). We suggest that sweepstakes reproduction in B. hordei is due to 1) neutrality (clonal/sexual phases and Boom-and-Bust cycles) generating a genome-wide level of background noise in the coalescent genealogies, and 2) selective sweepstakes due to pervasive positive selection. Our findings have important implications for both population genomic methodology and our understanding of pathogen evolution.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.5%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
5
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.8%
7
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
8
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
14
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
23
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
24
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
27
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
29
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%