Back

Scalable longitudinal imaging and transcriptomics of cells in dynamic enclosures

Khurana, T. K.; Wu, L. Y.; Gherardini, P. F.; Moeinzadeh, S.; Mohseni, M.; Yasar, F. G.; Dettloff, R.; Poelma, J.; Sabri, S.; Scaramozza, A.; Li, Y.; Rouzbeh, N.; Elder, N.; Deshmukh, S.; Majd, A.; Gupta, R.; Farahvashi, S.; Thomas, I.; Betts, C.; Charbonier, F.; Roberts, D.; Hsiung, P.-L.; Zargari-Pariset, E.; Yau, R.; Vila, O. F.; Phillips, M.; Xiao, C.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Adhikari, P.; Taing, M.; Farjami, E.; Javanmardi, B.; Siu, M.; The Cellanome Development Team, ; Valente, C.; Cox, C.; Geiger-Schuller, K.; Turley, S. J.; Rozenblatt-Rosen, O.; Fattahi, F.; Ecker, J. R.; Jones, J. R.; Ga

2026-05-08 systems biology
10.64898/2026.05.05.723030 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dynamic transitions between cell states underlie both normal physiology and disease. However, most single-cell technologies capture only static snapshots. To address this gap, we developed a platform that integrates light-guided hydrogel polymerization with computer vision to generate on-demand compartments around live cells, enabling longitudinal imaging of cellular behavior paired with whole-transcriptome profiling of the same cells at scale. These data link dynamic phenotypes with molecular programs, enabling deeper characterization of cellular states. This approach revealed an adaptive, drug-resistant state in lung cancer cells characterized by potassium channel upregulation and p53-dependent quiescence. In models of adipogenesis and microglial phagocytosis, joint analysis of imaging and transcriptomic data identified key drivers of cellular function that were missed by transcriptomic clustering alone. These results establish the value of paired functional and transcriptomic analysis to resolve molecular drivers of complex cellular behaviors.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.1%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Cell Systems
○ 201 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 11%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
9
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
10
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
11
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.7%
12
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.6%
13
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
15
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
17
npj Systems Biology and Applications
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
The EMBO Journal
○ 309 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
20
Science Signaling
● 65 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
21
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
22
npj Precision Oncology
○ 53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Patterns
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
Matrix Biology
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
PNAS Nexus
◐ 159 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
28
ACS Nano
● 113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Molecular Biology of the Cell
● 311 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.