Back

2D Skeletal Muscle Thin Film Actuators Enhance Efficiency of Biohybrid Robots

Bawa, M.; Berman, A.; Schwendeman, L.; Afghah, F.; Johnson, S.; Raman, R.

2026-05-08 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.05.723017 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biohybrid robots combining compliant synthetic support structures with biological actuators could enable future applications ranging from precision microsurgery to unmanned exploration. Machines actuated by living skeletal muscles are capable of adaptive behaviors, such as sensing and responding to environmental stimuli in real-time, offering functional advantages over non-biological actuators. However, typical skeletal muscle-powered biohybrid robots depend on 3D tissues which require large cell volumes and offer limited control of muscle fiber alignment, thus reducing efficiency of force generation and transduction. Here, we present a locomotive biohybrid robot powered by 2D monolayers, or thin films, of precisely aligned skeletal muscle fibers on a micropatterned hydrogel skeleton. We demonstrate how varying skeleton design parameters, ranging from material stiffness to microscale topology, impacts muscle fiber alignment and resultant actuation strains, generating forces 10X higher than previous 2D skeletal muscle actuators, improving untethered actuation longevity by [~]4500X from < 10 minutes to > 30 days, and increasing efficiency of muscle force output (force per unit volume of muscle) by 20X as compared to 3D muscles. Utilizing our optimized design for skeletal muscle thin films, we create a multi-limbed robot composed of independent muscle-powered fins capable of on/off control and frequency-dependent speed control. With these control inputs, we achieve steered multi-directional locomotion at speeds up to 4 body lengths per minute in straight movement and 1200 degrees per minute in rotational movement, highlighting potential for such actuators to be transformed into long-lasting functional soft robots.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.9%
3
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.9%
4
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
7
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
9
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
11
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.6%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
16
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
19
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%
24
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%