Back

Imatinib Reduces Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure Independent of Arterial or Venous Remodeling in an Inflammatory Murine Model of Pulmonary Hypertension

McGlynn, M.; Steffes, L. C.; Shah, A.; Morales, J.; Kumar, M. E.

2026-05-08 physiology
10.64898/2026.05.05.723006 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive, fatal disease driven by pathologic vascular remodeling including arterial medial hypertrophy, occlusive neointimal lesion formation, and venous muscularization. Current vasodilatory therapies improve hemodynamics but do not reverse established remodeling. Imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the PDGF-PDGFR signaling axis, has been proposed as an anti-remodeling therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension and has demonstrated hemodynamic benefit in both preclinical models and clinical trials. However, prior preclinical models lack the neointimal lesions characteristic of human disease, effects on venous remodeling have not been examined, and direct histologic assessment in human trials is precluded by the invasiveness of serial lung biopsy. Here, leveraging the house dust mite mouse model of pulmonary hypertension, which recapitulates medial thickening, neointimal lesion formation, and venous muscularization, we rigorously evaluate the anti-remodeling and hemodynamic effects of imatinib during two defined remodeling stages: neointimal lesion growth and neointimal lesion maintenance. Imatinib treatment significantly reduced right ventricular systolic pressure at both stages. Despite this hemodynamic improvement, quantitative vessel-level analysis of over 1,700 arteries and 1,200 veins revealed no significant effect of imatinib on arterial medial thickness, neointimal lesion growth, neointimal lesion maintenance, or venous muscularization across any vessel size class. These findings dissociate imatinibs hemodynamic benefit from structural vascular remodeling and suggest that imatinib functions primarily as a pulmonary vasodilator rather than an anti-remodeling agent.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
9.1%
4
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
6
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
7
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
8
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
20
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%
24
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%