Back

Genomic and Transcriptomic Basis of Salinity Tolerance in Dry Pea

Acharya, S. R.; Bredu, E.; Navasca, H.; Worral, H.; Piche, L.; Saludares, R. A.; Johnson, J. P.; Coyne, C.; Mcphee, K.; Zhang, Q.; Ostlie, M.; Bandillo, N.

2026-05-08 genetics
10.64898/2026.05.05.722931 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Salinity is a major crop production constraint in dry pea (Pisum sativum L.), making the development of salt-tolerant varieties essential to improve crop productivity and land-use efficiency. The genetic mechanisms of salt tolerance in dry pea is largely unknown, and research on salt-tolerant genes is limited. In this study, we established comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic resources, along with a robust screening protocol, to dissect the genetic basis of salinity tolerance using two germplasm sets: the USDA pea diversity panel, consisting of approximately 200 globally sourced accessions, and a set of 300 modern elite lines from the NDSU Pulse Crops Breeding Program. Genetic variation for the salinity response was assessed based on ten phenotypic traits, with root dry weight, shoot dry weight, and specific root length identified as key indicators based on their heritability. Genome-wide association mapping uncovered significant genomic regions and several candidate genes linked to salt stress, with the strongest association found on chromosome 6. Overlapping QTL signals across traits suggest a shared genetic architecture underlying salinity tolerance. Field-based transcriptomic analysis further identified five putative genes involved in salinity response conserved across multiple crop species. Notably, Psat5g000800, encoding a glycosyl hydrolase gene, was markedly upregulated under salinity stress. These findings highlight the complex, multi-gene regulatory nature of salinity tolerance in dry pea and underscore the importance of functional validation of candidate genes. This study provides key insights and practical tools to support breeding efforts aimed at improving salt tolerance in dry pea.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.0%
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
8
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
9
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
15
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
25
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%