Back

A PK-Driven Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model Predicts Cytokine Release Syndrome Severity Across T Cell-Activating Therapies via a Locked Amplification Network

besbassi, h.

2026-05-08 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.05.05.722920 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a major dose-limiting toxicity of T cell-engaging immunotherapies. Existing CRS models are drug-class-specific and have not addressed whether a single mechanistic cytokine network can capture severity differences across mechanistically distinct drug classes. Here, we developed a PK-driven quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model linking drug exposure, T cell activation dynamics, and a macrophage-amplified cytokine network to clinical CRS severity. The 17-parameter downstream amplification network with macrophage-gated STAT3 positive feedback was developed iteratively. The network was calibrated on blinatumomab, structurally refined using TGN1412 as a transparently disclosed development case, then locked and tested blind on OKT3. The same locked network was used to evaluate cross-drug transferability across three antibody-based T cell engager classes: bispecific, CD28 superagonist, and anti-CD3 with activation-induced cell death. The locked network reproduced the clinically observed CRS severity ordering across all three drugs without re-fitting any shared parameter. The OKT3 blind prediction passed eight qualitative plausibility checks and three of three quantitative cytokine peaks within published clinical ranges. Tocilizumab rescue simulation reproduced five clinically validated phenomena. A mechanistic parameter swap test reversing the T cell exhaustion rate between OKT3 and TGN1412 reversed CRS severity in the expected direction, supporting a mechanistic rather than parameter-fitted interpretation. Local robustness analysis (ABC-style accepted ensemble: 692 of 5,000 parameter sets accepted, 13.8%) and a 2D stability map over the two threshold-setting parameters (0 of 900 wrong-order combinations) confirmed that the cross-drug severity ordering is a property of a feasible parameter region rather than a single tuned point. Profile likelihood analysis of the IL-6 feedback and clearance rates revealed complementary asymmetric profiles consistent with practical identifiability as a ratio. The same locked model predicted three qualitatively distinct dose-response shapes without re-fitting. Findings should be interpreted as a mechanistic proof-of-concept; prospective clinical validation remains pending.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 6%
18.6%
2
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.4%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.0%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
6
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
11
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
17
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
22
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
29
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
30
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%