Back

Neural Network Guided Calibration for Fast Virtual Twin Generation in Cardiovascular ODE Models

Cabeleira, M. T.; Ray, S.; Ovenden, N.; Diaz-Zuccarini, V.

2026-05-08 physiology
10.64898/2026.05.05.722845 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Calibration of closed-loop lumped-parameter cardiovascular models remains a major bottleneck for scalable digital-twin generation because inverse estimation is ill-conditioned and typically requires computationally expensive iterative forward simulation. This study investigates whether a supervised neural network (NN) can provide a fast inverse estimator for a paediatric sepsis cardiovascular ODE model by learning a direct mapping from prescribed haemodynamic target vectors to calibrated parameter sets. Training data are generated by sampling model parameters at random, forward-simulating the closed-loop system to steady state, and pairing the resulting target summaries with the corresponding parameters; the same target definitions and evaluation populations are used throughout for consistency. We evaluate NN inference by forward re-simulation to steady state and benchmark performance against a simulator-constrained calibration reference (Embedded Gradient Descent, EGD) using relative-error statistics, distributional similarity of achieved outputs and inferred parameters (median shift, IQR ratio, Wasserstein distance, KS statistic), and target-space localisation of parameter-space disparity (cosine distance). The NN reproduces the prescribed targets with predominantly small errors for most samples, while the largest discrepancies are confined to a well defined set of target configurations that also yield high residuals under the reference method, indicating feasibility limits of the target/model combination. Overall, NN-guided calibration provides a computationally efficient accelerator for virtual-twin generation and target-space screening, with simulator-based refinement and forward re-simulation retained to handle infeasible regimes and enforce mechanistic plausibility.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
22.8%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.2%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.3%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
10
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
17
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
20
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
IFAC-PapersOnLine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%