Back

A unified framework links infant vulnerability with aging-related mortality dynamics

Shenhar, B.; Strauss, T.; Alon, U.

2026-05-08 systems biology
10.64898/2026.05.05.722841 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A central question in Geroscience is whether early-life mortality, which declines from birth to sexual maturity, and late-life mortality, which grows exponentially in time, can be understood within a shared conceptual framework. We show that stochastic threshold models can explain both phases by incorporating heterogeneity in neonatal vulnerability. Using U.S. National Center for Health Statistics data, we find that infant mortality risk is strongly associated with neonatal clinical markers such as Apgar scores, gestational age, and birth weight, suggesting that initial physiological differences persist across early life. We show that the [~]1/t mortality decline generically arises in stochastic threshold models via depletion of the most vulnerable, across a wide range of model specifications. Incorporating this mechanism into the Saturating-Removal model captures both the early decline and the later Gompertz acceleration, reproducing the full J-shaped mortality curve. Together, our findings link neonatal vulnerability to late-life mortality dynamics within a shared stochastic framework, supporting a life-course perspective on aging and longevity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
28.8%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.5%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.6%
4
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.4%
7
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
10
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
11
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.8%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
15
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
19
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
20
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.7%
26
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.5%
30
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%