Back

Mathematical Modeling of the Canonical Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Pathway

Wieland, V.; Blum, T.; Iriady, I.; Reverte-Salisa, L.; Pathirana, D.; Foerster, I.; Weighardt, H.; Hasenauer, J.

2026-05-08 systems biology
10.64898/2026.05.05.722708 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor involved in xenobiotic sensing, as well as development, immunity, and tissue homeostasis. AhR signaling can proceed through a canonical and non-canonical pathway; the present study focuses on the canonical pathway. While ligand-dependent differences in binding affinities and direct ligand degradation kinetics are well known, and subtle differences in ligand binding can shape downstream signaling, it is still unclear which biochemical reaction steps within the canonical pathway are responsible for distinct ligand-specific transcriptional responses. Here, we developed a mechanistic ordinary differential equation model of the canonical AhR pathway. We calibrated the model to time-resolved qPCR measurements of Cyp1a1 and Ahrr mRNA in mouse bone-marrow-derived macrophages exposed to structurally diverse, environmentally relevant ligands with known immunomodulatory activity (3-methylcholanthrene, indolo[3,2-b]carbazole, and bisphenol A) using global optimization under a heteroskedastic likelihood. To dissect ligand specificity, we evaluated 528 candidate models that allow one or two ligand-involving reaction rate constants to vary. Akaike-based model selection reveals a dominant dynamical regime governed by promoter occupancy and target-gene mRNA synthesis, indicating that ligand-specific transcriptional responses are primarily encoded at the level of transcriptional regulation rather than upstream signaling events. The resulting model is made available in SBML and PEtab formats for reproducibility, and to enable further research into whether ligand-specific effects are conserved or rewired across cell types.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.2%
2
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
5
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.1%
7
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
8
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
12
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
13
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
14
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
16
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
19
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
23
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%
29
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%