Back

KRAS-Mediated CCDC6 Degradation Drives xCT Upregulation and Ferroptosis Evasion

Criscuolo, D.; Catalano, R.; Baviello, C.; Fioravanti, C.; Vigliar, E.; Morra, F.; Marotta, M.; Mimura, J.; Iaccarino, A.; Pepe, F.; Belotti, D.; Troncone, G.; Merolla, F.; Melillo, R. M.; Celetti, A.

2026-05-08 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.05.721389 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oncogenic KRAS mutations drive tumorigenesis by promoting pro-survival signaling and metabolic reprogramming, including the maintenance of redox balance to evade oxidative stress. A key mechanism involves the upregulation of the xCT cystine/glutamate antiporter, which sustains glutathione (GSH) synthesis and protects cells from oxidative damage and ferroptosis. While it is known that the ETS1-ATF4 complex mediates transcriptional upregulation of xCT, the upstream regulators linking KRAS signaling to this axis remain to be fully defined. Here, we demonstrate that oncogenic KRAS signaling induces the GSK3{beta}-mediated proteasomal degradation of the tumor suppressor CCDC6. We show that CCDC6 acts as a negative regulator of the xCT-promoting transcription factor ATF4 by directly interacting with it and preventing its recruitment to the xCT promoter. Consequently, KRAS-driven CCDC6 degradation disinhibits ATF4, leading to increased xCT expression, elevated intracellular GSH, and enhanced resistance to ferroptosis. Crucially, pharmacological inhibition of CCDC6 turnover using proteasome, GSK3{beta}, or specific KRAS mutant inhibitors (Sotorasib, Adagrasib, HRS4642) restored CCDC6 protein levels and robustly sensitized KRAS-mutated cells to ferroptosis-inducing agents like Sulfasalazine. Furthermore, validation in preclinical models and human colorectal cancer samples revealed that CCDC6 protein levels are predominantly downregulated in KRAS-mutant cases This work uncovers a novel KRAS/CCDC6/xCT signaling axis that mediates ferroptosis resistance in KRAS-mutated cancers. Moreover, it identifies CCDC6 turnover as a critical vulnerability and a promising therapeutic target to enhance the efficacy of ferroptosis-inducing agents.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 10%
14.6%
2
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
14.3%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.0%
4
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
5
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
6
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.0%
7
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.6%
10
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
11
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
12
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
17
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Cell Death & Differentiation
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
22
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
25
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
30
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%