Back

An analysis of retinal safety when using a laser based low-level red light therapy device for myopia

Schulmeister, K.; Marshall, J.

2026-05-07 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.05.05.26352503 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the retinal safety of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy using the Eyerising Myopia Management Device (EMMD) by analysing exposure parameters relative to established thermal and photochemical retinal injury thresholds and empirical human exposure data. MethodsEmission characteristics of the EMMD were measured in an accredited laboratory under worst-case conditions. Parameters assessed included wavelength, intraocular power, corneal irradiance, and retinal image characteristics across accommodative states. These measurements were compared with international safety standards, maximum permissible exposure limits, and experimentally derived retinal injury thresholds from animal studies and validated computational models. The effects of repeated exposures from RLRL therapy using the EMMD were evaluated using photochemical additivity principles and repair kinetics, and further contextualised using human volunteer exposure data. ResultsThe EMMD emitted red laser radiation at 654-655 nm with a maximum intraocular power of approximately 1 mW through a 7 mm pupil, placing it within Class 3R and marginally above the Class 2 limit. Corneal irradiance was approximately 26 W m- 2, well below conservative photochemical exposure limits. Thermal injury modelling indicated retinal damage thresholds above device exposure, including under worst-case assumptions of minimal retinal image size and absence of eye movements. Accounting for repeated daily exposures and photochemical additivity, safety margins remained approximately 3-fold for a 7 mm pupil and approximately 8-fold for a more realistic 4 mm pupil. Human volunteer studies demonstrated no detectable structural or functional retinal injury at exposure levels approximately five times higher than those produced by the EMMD. ConclusionExposure parameters of RLRL therapy using the EMMD remain well below conservative retinal injury thresholds under prescribed use conditions. Integration of experimental, modelling, and human data indicates substantial safety margins, supporting its safe clinical use.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.5%
2
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
5
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
6
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
7
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
8
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
10
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
15
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
25
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%