MDMA-Assisted Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial Incremental Effects Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Borgogna, N. C.; Whittington, D. D.; Owen, T.; Petrovitch, D.; Vaughn, J.; Struble, C.; Pagano, L. A.; Aita, S. L.; Hill, B. D.
Show abstract
Mental illness poses a substantial global burden, yet existing psychotherapies and psychopharmacologies often produce limited outcomes. Psychedelic assisted therapies have emerged as potential transdiagnostic interventions. In particular, 3,4 methylenedioxymethamphetamine assisted therapy (MDMA AT) has generated interest for its rapid psychological effects and potential to enhance psychotherapy outcomes. However, the incremental efficacy of MDMA AT relative to control interventions across transdiagnostic outcomes remains unclear. Further, there have been emerging concerns regarding harm reporting quality in MDMA AT clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta analysis of MDMA AT randomized controlled trials. Eleven publications representing eight controlled trials with 10 analyzed subgroups (n = 295 participants) were included in meta-analyses. Two additional secondary publications were included for harm reporting syntheses (k = 13 total). Across 114 extracted effect sizes, MDMA AT demonstrated a significant moderate-to-large incremental reduction in psychopathology relative to controls (g = 1.03, 95% CI [0.46, 1.60]), though heterogeneity was high (I squared = 76%). Incremental effects were larger versus inert placebos (g = 1.27) than active controls (g = 0.75). Symptom specific analyses indicated strong incremental effects for trauma reduction (g=1.46 [95% CI: 0.67, 2.25]) and smaller non-significant effects for depression (g=0.51 [95% CI: -0.06, 1.08]). Harm reporting quality synthesis showed only 23% of publications met high-quality reporting standards. Overall, MDMA AT demonstrates potential transdiagnostic efficacy, but small samples, confounding factors, and mediocre harm reporting highlight the need for larger more transparent clinical trials.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- From Feasibility to Utility: A Meta-Analysis of Amygdala-Neurofeedback 93%
- Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with evidence-based psychotherapy for psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis of optimal implementation parameters 93%
- Psychological Distress and Metabolomic Markers: A Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of cannabis use, tobacco use and incident anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- A single dose of lamotrigine induces a positive memory bias in healthy volunteers 92%
- Approaches to improve mental health care for autistic children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis 93%
- Oral Ketamine for the Treatment of Depression: A randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis 92%
- Increased neurotoxicity due to activated immune-inflammatory and nitro-oxidative stress pathways in patients with suicide attempts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low dose oral ketamine treatment on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (OKTOP): An open-label pilot study 96%
- Effects of cannabis use on antidepressant treatment response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and ketamine 94%
- A meta-analysis of polygenic risk scores for mood disorders, neuroticism, and schizophrenia in antidepressant response 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.