Back

Long-Read Haplotype Phasing Resolves Allelic Configuration as a Missing Layer of Precision Oncology

Vo, J. N.; Wu, Y.-M.; Wang, R.; Pham, T.; Cao, X.; Yeung, S.; Park, M.; Kleyman-Smith, Y.; Teo, G. C.; Wu, A.; Li, A.; Estill, J.; Kunju, L. P.; Yang, C.; Robinson, D. R.; Chinnaiyan, A. M.

2026-05-05 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.05.26351600 medRxiv
Show abstract

Conventional short-read sequencing cannot determine whether co-occurring variants within a cancer gene reside on the same allele (cis) or on opposing alleles (trans), a distinction with direct biological and therapeutic consequences. Trans configurations confirm biallelic tumor suppressor inactivation and inform therapy selection, while cis configurations generate compound oncogenic alleles with enhanced activity. We analyzed 768 patients with prostate, breast, or ovarian cancers in the PROBLEM cohort, using mutational signatures to nominate cryptic genomic instability cases where the causative biallelic event was not apparent from short-read sequencing. Long-read nanopore sequencing resolved 32 of 46 cryptic cases (69.6%), leveraging its unique advantages in direct methylation detection, long insertion resolution, and complex structural variant characterization, confirming trans biallelic inactivation in all resolved tumor suppressor cases. Systematic analysis of 4,496 MiOncoSeq samples identified 17,519 multi-hit gene pairs, of which 78.7% exceeded the 500 bp short-read phasing limit. Long-read phasing further revealed recurrent compound cis oncogenic alleles in NOTCH1, PIK3CA, PDGFRB, and KIT with functionally synergistic activity. Haplotype phasing resolves a systematically overlooked gap in cancer variant interpretation and warrants broader integration into precision oncology workflows. Statement of SignificanceShort-read sequencing cannot resolve whether co-occurring variants within a cancer gene are cis or trans, a distinction critical for clinical interpretation. Long-read nanopore sequencing addresses this gap through direct haplotype phasing, methylation detection, and complex structural variant resolution, confirming biallelic tumor suppressor inactivation and revealing compound cis oncogenic alleles with enhanced activity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
6
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
8
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
10
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.8%
12
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.1%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.9%
21
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%