The Impact of Multi-Cancer Early Detection Tests on Cancer Mortality: A 10-Year Microsimulation Model
Xiao, J.; ElHabr, A. K.; Tyson, C.; Cao, X.; Fendrick, A. M.; Ozbay, A. B.; Limburg, P.; Beer, T. M.; Deshmukh, A. A.; Chhatwal, J.
Show abstract
PurposeEarly detection of cancer can improve survival following diagnosis. However, routine screening is limited to a few cancer types. Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests could substantially expand cancer screening by simultaneously detecting multiple cancer types. This modeling study evaluates the potential impact of an MCED test on cancer outcomes in the US general population. MethodsWe developed a microsimulation model of 14 solid tumor cancer types which account for nearly 80% of cancer incidence and mortality. The model was calibrated to reproduce annual incidence rates reported in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer diagnosis could arise from standard-of-care (SoC) procedures or annual MCED testing. MCED sensitivities were derived from a case-control clinical validation study. We simulated the 10-year life course of 5 million US adults aged 50-84 years. The primary outcome was cancer mortality reduction due to MCED testing. ResultsIn the best case with perfect uptake and adherence, MCED testing added to the SoC led to a 23% decrease in 10-year cancer mortality relative to the SoC alone, translating to 668,600 cancer deaths averted over 10 years. The largest mortality reductions, in absolute terms, were observed for lung (160; 802 versus 962 per 100,000), colorectal (118; 168 versus 284), and pancreatic (50; 238 versus 288) cancer. The largest relative reductions were in cervical (52%), colorectal (41%), and breast (34%) cancer. The population-level life-year gain was 7,158 years per 100,000. ConclusionMCED testing has the potential to substantially reduce cancer-related deaths, improve outcomes across multiple cancer types.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Screening and Follow-up Colonoscopy Adenoma Sensitivity on Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the CRC-AIM Microsimulation Model 93%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 92%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer incidence and mortality in Canada 94%
- Effects of Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Development, Documentation and Validation of a Multistate Markov Model 94%
- Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Quantitative Framework to Study Potential Benefits and Harms of Multi-cancer Early Detection Testing 97%
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 93%
- Site-specific cancer incidence by race and immigration status in Canada 2006-2015: a population-based data linkage study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- CA125 and age-based models for ovarian cancer detection in primary care: a population-based external validation study 93%
- Cost-effectiveness of CA125- and age-informed risk-based triage for ovarian cancer detection in primary care 93%
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.