Back

ZBTB38 requires an extended N-terminal zinc finger network to read mCpG- and discriminate TpG-containing DNA sequences

Boster, J.; Gangi, C.; Hudson, N. O.; Billings, D. E.; Guerra Castanaza Jenkins, B. L.; DIng, V. L.; Buck, B. A.

2026-05-07 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.04.722763 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Methylation of cytosine bases in the CpG context (mCpG) is an essential regulatory mechanism cells use to spatially and temporally orchestrate access to genomic regions and mediate transcription. In many diseases, DNA methylation patterns become inappropriately distributed leading to aberrant transcriptional outcomes. Methyl-CpG binding proteins (MBPs) are key epigenetic mediators that selectively recognize mCpG sites, translating these signals into discrete transcriptional responses. ZBTB38 is a zinc finger (ZF) MBP that uniquely harbors two sets of five ZF clusters; each capable of selectively distinguishing mCpG sites. While the cognate DNA sequence and molecular basis for selective mCpG recognition have been defined for the ZBTB38 C-terminal (C-term) ZF domain, the molecular basis for differentiating DNA targets by the N-terminal (N-term) ZF domain remained uncharacterized. Here we report the mCpG-containing consensus sequence for the ZBTB38 N-term ZFs and demonstrate that unlike the other two ZBTB MBP family members ZBTB33 (Kaiso) and ZBTB4, the three shared core ZF domain discriminates against binding to TpG-containing DNA, and that at least one additional N-term ZF is required to stabilize DNA engagement. In addition, we demonstrate that each ZBTB38 ZF domain exhibits preferential target recognition for their respective cognate methylated DNA consensus motif. These findings expand understanding for how ZBTB38 differentially mediates epigenetic-based transcriptional process in normal and disease-state cells by providing new insight into the molecular basis by which the ZBTB38 N-term ZF domain differentiates DNA targets and offering further insight into the interplay between the N- and C-term ZF domains in directing cellular activities.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 8%
18.7%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.1%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 5%
8.0%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 15%
7.3%
5
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 10%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
Molecular Cell
350 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.3%
9
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
12
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
17
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
19
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
20
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
22
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Immunity
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Epigenetics & Chromatin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
26
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Mobile DNA
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
The FEBS Journal
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%