Back

Co-Targeting Nuclear Export and Translation Initiation Uncovers a Therapeutic Vulnerability in Lethal Prostate Cancer

Kindrick, J. D.; Bhadresha, K.; Zhang, X.; Beatson, E. L.; Gaut, S. S.; Brim, B. C.; Depaz, R.; Signorelli, P.; Horner, J. L.; Whidden, P. S.; Ching, J. M.; Wilson, K.; Wood, S.; McKnight, C.; Beck, E.; Klumpp-Thomas, C.; Lake, R.; Edmondson, E.; Ceribelli, M.; Chau, C. H.; Thomas, C.; Figg, W. D.

2026-05-07 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.04.722693 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains lethal as adaptive resistance to standard-of-care therapy develops, often driven by AR splice variants alongside transcriptional and translational reprogramming. To identify strategies capable of overcoming these mechanisms, we performed an unbiased high-throughput screen of 2,480 mechanistically annotated compounds across advanced prostate cancer models. Exportin-1 (XPO1)-mediated nuclear export emerged as a critical dependency, and matrix-based combination screening uncovered robust synergy between inhibitors of XPO1 and the translation initiation factor EIF4A1. Dual inhibition induced coordinated disruption of oncogenic protein networks, including AR/AR-V7, triggering apoptosis and suppressing cell-cycle and metabolic programs. These effects extended to genetically diverse patient-derived organoids and in vivo xenografts at low doses, approximately 8-fold (Eltanexor) and 12-fold (Zotatifin) below established human single-agent regimens. Together, these findings reveal concurrent control of nuclear export and protein translation as a therapeutic vulnerability in mCRPC, providing a strong rationale for clinical evaluation of XPO1-EIF4A1 co-inhibition to overcome AR-driven resistance. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEUnbiased combinatorial screening reveals co-inhibition of nuclear export and translation initiation as a vulnerability in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Dual targeting of XPO1 and EIF4A1 drives synergistic collapse of oncogenic protein networks, including AR/AR-V7 signaling, to overcome key resistance mechanisms and induce potent antitumor responses across heterogeneous models. Notably, these effects are achieved at substantially reduced doses using clinically tractable agents, defining a mechanistically grounded therapeutic strategy poised for rapid clinical translation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.9%
2
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.8%
4
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
5
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.7%
6
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
7
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.6%
12
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.8%
15
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
24
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
25
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
28
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%