Back

Future-proofing agrobiodiversity: climate and niche-aware conservation planning using reinforcement learning.

Butikofer, L.; Silvestro, D.; Rubio Teso, L.; Molina, A.; Lara Romero, C.; Garcia Valdes, R.; Broenniman, O.; Iriondo, J. M.; Guisan, A.; Petitpierre, B.; Aubry, S.

2026-05-07 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.04.722509 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite substantial global commitments to expand protected-area networks, the strategic allocation of limited resources remains challenging. Spatial conservation planning helps identify priority regions that maximise conservation benefits per unit area. Yet, they also tend to neglect two fundamental aspects of conservation: climate-driven range shifts and the representation of environmentally distinct populations within species. Here, we propose a continental-scale conservation planning framework that explicitly accounts for both processes through novel routines implemented in the conservation planning software CAPTAIN. We apply this framework to European crop wild relatives (CWR), for which niche coverage is a focal priority, as it underpins their potential to support agricultural adaptation to future environmental stressors through breeding programs. Comparative analyses on a subset of 186 CWR associated with five focal crops show that accounting for range shifts and niche coverage leads to substantially different conservation priorities from those obtained with a baseline model based on current distributions only. These additions reduced the number of non-protected species by 64%, increased the average protected distribution range by 43%, increased mean niche coverage from 75.8% to 84.5% and reduced the number of species with less than half of their niche protected from 35 to 10. Applied to a more comprehensive checklist of 1,140 European CWRs, the final framework identifies continental-scale priority areas representing 93.5% of these taxa and includes 94.4% of its critically endangered species. Our results highlight the importance of incorporating both temporal dynamics and within-species environmental representation when designing conservation strategies under climate change. RepositoryThe repository will be made publicly accessible after publication at doi: https://10.5281/zenodo.19855597

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
3
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.7%
5
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.3%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.9%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
17
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
20
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
25
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
26
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
28
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
30
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%