Back

Vestibulomotor Weighting Associated with Cybersickness in Virtual Reality

Goar, M.; Barnett-Cowan, M.

2026-05-07 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.04.722436 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cybersickness is a major barrier to the widespread adoption of virtual reality (VR), yet its underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study investigated the relationship between vestibulomotor weighting and cybersickness. Vestibulomotor weighting was quantified using electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS), with coherence and gain between the EVS input and medial-lateral center-of-pressure (ML-CoP) responses indexing the contribution of vestibular input to postural control. Thirty-eight healthy young adults (females n=21, males n=17) completed a standing VR rollercoaster task while receiving continuous stochastic EVS (0-25 Hz; {+/-}4.5 mA), with ML-CoP responses recorded using a force plate. Cybersickness was assessed using the Fast Motion Sickness Scale (FMS) and Simulator Sickness Questionnaire, and participants were classified as non-sick (FMS < 5), medium-sick (FMS [&ge;] 5), or high-sick (terminated the VR exposure early due to intolerance). Baseline EVS-ML-CoP coherence across 2.5-8 Hz was significantly greater in high-sick than in non-sick participants, indicating elevated vestibulomotor weighting in individuals who developed symptoms. During VR exposure, coherence declined over time in symptomatic groups (mean slope = -0.0027 for medium-sick), whereas non-sick participants maintained consistently low coherence (mean slope = -0.0005). Despite this reduction in vestibular coupling, postural sway increased in the high-sick group relative to the medium-and non-sick groups (+29% vs. -7% and -30% change in ML-CoP RMS, respectively), while vestibular-evoked response amplitude decreased (gain reduced by 64% across 2.5-3.5 Hz). These findings indicate that greater baseline vestibulomotor weighting was associated with increased susceptibility to cybersickness, whereas reductions in vestibular contributions during VR with EVS reflected adaptive reweighting that was insufficient to prevent instability and symptom progression. Together, the results highlight baseline sensory reliance as a key determinant of cybersickness vulnerability and suggest that reweighting during exposure plays a secondary, mitigating role. New and NoteworthyWe provide the first evidence that baseline vestibulomotor weighting predicts susceptibility to cybersickness in virtual reality and is dynamically reduced during exposure. Using electrical vestibular stimulation, we show that symptomatic individuals begin with greater reliance on vestibular input for postural control and progressively downweight these signals in response to sensory conflict.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
16.9%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.9%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.9%
4
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
11
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
12
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
14
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
19
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
23
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%