The contribution of short tandem repeats to splicing variation in the human cortex
Li, Y.; Margoliash, J.; Goren, A.; Gymrek, M.
Show abstract
Splicing disruption has been implicated in a range of heritable phenotypes, including numerous psychiatric and neurological disorders. Recent studies have identified thousands of common genetic variants impacting splicing in brain and other tissues, but have focused largely on single nucleotide polymorphisms or short indels. Despite growing evidence that genetic variation at short tandem repeats (STRs) influences splicing, large-scale studies of STR-mediated splicing in brain have been limited by low sample sizes of available RNA-seq data or exclusion of certain classes of STRs, such as homopolymers which account for around half of all STRs. In this study, we leveraged deep RNA-seq and SNP array data from 336 human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) samples collected by the Human Brain Collection Core (HBCC). We imputed 445,720 STRs into available genotype data and identified 51,343 unique STRs for which copy number is significantly associated with one or multiple alternative splicing events of nearby genes (spliceSTRs). We prioritized and characterized candidate causal spliceSTRs using three orthogonal fine-mapping strategies which identified 1,313 high-confidence fine-mapped spliceSTRs. Our analyses revealed strong associations between copy number of certain repeat units and binding of specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), including a previously known relationship between HNRNPL and AC repeat length, suggesting that the functional impact of some spliceSTRs may be mediated through their binding affinity for RBPs. Finally, co-localization analyses using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for 6 brain-related disorders identified multiple signals that may be driven by spliceSTRs, including a previously identified GTn repeat that is a spliceSTR for PLEKHA1 associated with Alzheimers disease as well as a newly identified AGGn spliceSTR in SEPTIN3 co-localized with schizophrenia. Together, our findings highlight the role of STRs in regulating alternative splicing in the human brain, suggest a general relationship between STR polymorphism and RBP-mediated splicing events, and support the hypothesis that splicing variation mediated by STRs plays a role in risk for brain-related disorders.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide landscape of RNA-binding protein dysregulation reveals a major impact on psychiatric disorder risk 97%
- Systematic assessment of regulatory effects of human disease variants in pluripotent cells 97%
- Genotyping sequence-resolved copy number variationusing pangenomes reveals paralog-specific global diversityand expression divergence of duplicated genes 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification and analysis of splicing quantitative trait loci across multiple tissues in the human genome 98%
- A spatial long-read approach at near-single-cell resolution reveals developmental regulation of splicing and polyadenylation sites in distinct cortical layers and cell types. 97%
- Cellular and genetic drivers of RNA editing variation in the human brain 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Misexpression of inactive genes in whole blood is associated with nearby rare structural variants 97%
- Impact of genome build on RNA-seq interpretation and diagnostics 97%
- Characterization of non-coding variants associated with transcription factor binding through ATAC-seq-defined footprint QTLs in liver 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variant-resolved prediction of context-specific isoform variation with a graph-based attention model 98%
- Polymorphic short tandem repeats make widespread contributions to blood and serum traits 97%
- Effects of gene dosage on cognitive ability: A function-based association study across brain and non-brain processes 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.