Understanding implementation of HEARTS for hypertension and diabetes in Guatemala: Qualitative and mixed-methods pilot results
Valley, T. M.; Santizo-Malafronti, C.; Wellmann, I. A.; Ayala, L. F.; Lucas, N.; Huffman, M. D.; Chary, A.; Rohloff, P.; Donis, R.; Alvarez Nufio, A. I. A.; Ramirez-Zea, M.; Flood, D.
Show abstract
ObjectivesMost countries in Latin America have committed to adopting HEARTS, PAHOs recommended approach for managing hypertension and diabetes in national primary care health systems. This study aimed to understand and refine a HEARTS pilot for scale-up in Guatemala. MethodsTeam members conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 patients and health workers participating in a HEARTS pilot across 10 primary care facilities in Guatemalas Ministry of Health system. Researchers analyzed interviews using a combined inductive-deductive approach alongside the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework and used convergent mixed methods to generate meta-inferences. ResultsDespite high feasibility and acceptability scores, health workers described tensions between HEARTS and competing responsibilities. Patients described rational navigation of an unreliable system, a more fitting explanation for low retention than noncompliance. Both patients and health workers understood HEARTS as another externally funded project with uncertain sustainability. Medication availability improved during the pilot, but district and facility-level incentive structures perpetuated supply unreliability. Greater absolute treatment gains for hypertension than for diabetes likely reflected health worker comfort and preexisting access to blood pressure monitoring supplies. Both patients and health workers identified education gaps. Integration of qualitative and quantitative findings suggested concrete scale-up refinements, including simplifying treatment protocols, strengthening diabetes components, focusing training on nurses, reforming central-level pharmaceutical supply policies, and securing high-level Ministry of Health commitments. ConclusionsA HEARTS pilot trial in Guatemala met pre-specified quantitative outcomes, but qualitative and mixed-methods approaches revealed key barriers. These findings will assist in refining HEARTS in Guatemala for planned national scale-up. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06080451)
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 96%
- Stakeholder perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary care in Kenya 95%
- Acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- What constitutes 'poor' adherence to medical advice for chronic diseases? Insights from a qualitative study among hypertension and diabetes patients in urban informal settlements, Mumbai Metropolitan Region 95%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 94%
- Attrition and associated factors among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy at Mulago hospital, Uganda: A mixed method study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating Community-Based Health Information System with a Patient-Centered Medical Home to Improve Care of Patients with Hypertension: A Longitudinal Observational Study Protocol 95%
- Revisiting the use and effectiveness of patient-held records in rural Malawi 95%
- Assessing Language Difficulties in Health Facilities in Malawi 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing contents for a digital drug adherence tool with reminder cues and personalized feedback: a formative mixed-methods study among children and adolescents living with HIV in Tanzania 92%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 92%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-sector Decision Landscape in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of North Carolina Decision-Makers 93%
- A Development and Implementation of a Preconception Counseling Program for Black Women and Men in the Southeastern United States: A Pilot Protocol 93%
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.