Back

Understanding implementation of HEARTS for hypertension and diabetes in Guatemala: Qualitative and mixed-methods pilot results

Valley, T. M.; Santizo-Malafronti, C.; Wellmann, I. A.; Ayala, L. F.; Lucas, N.; Huffman, M. D.; Chary, A.; Rohloff, P.; Donis, R.; Alvarez Nufio, A. I. A.; Ramirez-Zea, M.; Flood, D.

2026-05-06 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.04.26352395 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesMost countries in Latin America have committed to adopting HEARTS, PAHOs recommended approach for managing hypertension and diabetes in national primary care health systems. This study aimed to understand and refine a HEARTS pilot for scale-up in Guatemala. MethodsTeam members conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 patients and health workers participating in a HEARTS pilot across 10 primary care facilities in Guatemalas Ministry of Health system. Researchers analyzed interviews using a combined inductive-deductive approach alongside the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework and used convergent mixed methods to generate meta-inferences. ResultsDespite high feasibility and acceptability scores, health workers described tensions between HEARTS and competing responsibilities. Patients described rational navigation of an unreliable system, a more fitting explanation for low retention than noncompliance. Both patients and health workers understood HEARTS as another externally funded project with uncertain sustainability. Medication availability improved during the pilot, but district and facility-level incentive structures perpetuated supply unreliability. Greater absolute treatment gains for hypertension than for diabetes likely reflected health worker comfort and preexisting access to blood pressure monitoring supplies. Both patients and health workers identified education gaps. Integration of qualitative and quantitative findings suggested concrete scale-up refinements, including simplifying treatment protocols, strengthening diabetes components, focusing training on nurses, reforming central-level pharmaceutical supply policies, and securing high-level Ministry of Health commitments. ConclusionsA HEARTS pilot trial in Guatemala met pre-specified quantitative outcomes, but qualitative and mixed-methods approaches revealed key barriers. These findings will assist in refining HEARTS in Guatemala for planned national scale-up. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06080451)

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
20.1%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.8%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
10.4%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.6%
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
8
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
10
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
11
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
12
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
13
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%