Back

Modeling rare coding variation on chromosome X provides insight into the genetics and differential sex prevalence of autism spectrum disorder

Satterstrom, F. K.; Jodeiry, K.; Mahjani, B.; Hatem, G.; Park, S. J.; Klei, L.; Fu, J. M.; Wigdor, E. M.; the Autism Sequencing Consortium, ; Betancur, C.; Daly, M. J.; Roeder, K.; Devlin, B.; Buxbaum, J. D.; Cutler, D. J.

2026-05-07 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.05.04.26352380 medRxiv
Show abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is estimated to be up to four times as common in males as in females, yet the causes of this prevalence difference are not well established. One possible driver is genetic variation on the X chromosome, as it contains genes capable of contributing to ASD (e.g., PTCHD1, MECP2) and is known to play a role in genetic disorders with differential sex prevalence (e.g., color blindness). However, a lack of power compared to the autosomes combined with the complexities of modeling its biology have led to the X being largely overlooked in sequencing studies. Here, we develop quantitative X-linked TADA, a new model designed specifically for application to this chromosome, and use it to analyze rare variation from 50,663 individuals with ASD (and 136,670 individuals total). We find 9 genes on the X associated with ASD at a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and an additional 9 genes at FDR < 0.2, with many of these previously identified as involved in specific neurodevelopmental disorders. Point estimates of the liability conferred by de novo variants on the X are similar in females and males, with both sexes estimates elevated >20% above the corresponding autosomal values. We also develop a general theory of how X-linked variation of any additive or non-additive effect influences liability and describe its implications for prevalence. Using this theory and our empirical results, we show how genetic variation on the X could contribute to the sex-differential prevalence of ASD.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.0%
2
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.5%
5
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
6
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.8%
9
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
11
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
12
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
15
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
18
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
20
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Molecular Autism
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
25
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
26
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%