Back

Modeling rare coding variation on chromosome X provides insight into the genetics and differential sex prevalence of autism spectrum disorder

Satterstrom, F. K.; Jodeiry, K.; Mahjani, B.; Hatem, G.; Park, S. J.; Klei, L.; Fu, J. M.; Wigdor, E. M.; the Autism Sequencing Consortium, ; Betancur, C.; Daly, M. J.; Roeder, K.; Devlin, B.; Buxbaum, J. D.; Cutler, D. J.

2026-05-07 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.05.04.26352380 medRxiv
Show abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is estimated to be up to four times as common in males as in females, yet the causes of this prevalence difference are not well established. One possible driver is genetic variation on the X chromosome, as it contains genes capable of contributing to ASD (e.g., PTCHD1, MECP2) and is known to play a role in genetic disorders with differential sex prevalence (e.g., color blindness). However, a lack of power compared to the autosomes combined with the complexities of modeling its biology have led to the X being largely overlooked in sequencing studies. Here, we develop quantitative X-linked TADA, a new model designed specifically for application to this chromosome, and use it to analyze rare variation from 50,663 individuals with ASD (and 136,670 individuals total). We find 9 genes on the X associated with ASD at a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and an additional 9 genes at FDR < 0.2, with many of these previously identified as involved in specific neurodevelopmental disorders. Point estimates of the liability conferred by de novo variants on the X are similar in females and males, with both sexes estimates elevated >20% above the corresponding autosomal values. We also develop a general theory of how X-linked variation of any additive or non-additive effect influences liability and describe its implications for prevalence. Using this theory and our empirical results, we show how genetic variation on the X could contribute to the sex-differential prevalence of ASD.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.8%
4
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
7
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
8
Molecular Autism
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
10
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Autism Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
13
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 22%
2.4%
15
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
16
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
17
Behavior Genetics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
19
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
26
Journal of Medical Genetics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
27
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%