Back

Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from B-Mode and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using a Dual-Path Convolutional Network

Obeti, F.; Asiku, R. A.

2026-05-05 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.04.26352359 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with particularly severe consequences in sub-Saharan Africa where access to advanced diagnostic imaging remains limited. Ultrasound is the most widely available imaging modality in low-resource settings, yet its sensitivity for detecting early-stage HCC remains insufficient when used in conventional B-mode alone. MethodsWe present a dual-path convolutional neural network (CNN) that jointly analyzes B-mode and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images for automated HCC detection. The model processes 1,057 labeled liver ultrasound images from 85 patients sourced from The Cancer Imaging Archive, a publicly available single-center dataset. A preprocessing pipeline extracts liver-centered regions of interest from heterogeneous DICOM files, including automatic separation of dual-panel B-mode and CEUS frames. Each imaging modality is processed through a dedicated ResNet-34 backbone initialized with ImageNet weights, and the resulting feature embeddings are fused through a late-fusion classification head. The model is evaluated using patient-wise five-fold cross-validation and a held-out 20% patient-level test set. ResultsOn the held-out test set, the model achieved 94.2% accuracy, 93.6% precision, 100% sensitivity, 83.3% specificity, and a 96.7% F1-score for binary HCC versus non-HCC classification. Cross-validation analysis showed consistently high discrimination across folds, with AUC values ranging from 0.93 to 0.98. Training dynamics indicated that early stopping typically activated between epochs seven and eleven, with validation loss closely tracking training loss and no evidence of severe overfitting under the chosen regularization scheme. ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that a relatively lightweight multimodal CNN, trained on carefully preprocessed public data, can provide strong imaging-level discrimination between HCC and non-HCC findings within a single-center dataset. However, the small sample size, pronounced class imbalance, and single-center origin of the data preclude any claims of clinical utility at this stage. This work is a transparent, reproducible methodological baseline intended to support future multi-site validation, particularly in African and other low-resource clinical settings where ultrasound-based decision support could have the greatest impact.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.3%
3
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.5%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
7
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
12
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
22
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
30
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%