Back

Long-term within-person variation of routinely measured biomarkers are associated with mortality and cardiovascular health

Webster, A. J.; Drakesmith, C. W.; Perera-Salazar, R.; Steinsaltz, D.; COMPUTE team,

2026-05-05 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.04.26352236 medRxiv
Show abstract

Biomarker measurements can assist with disease diagnosis and the assessment of disease risks, with the most recent measurements usually used by disease-risk models. However, a growing number of studies suggest that in addition to a biomarkers value, its inherent variability, estimated from several measurements over many days or years in an individual, can convey independent prognostic information about disease risks. Variance estimates require an individuals biomarker data to have been measured a sufficient number of times, ideally across a long time period, and are usually only available in a hospital setting or clinical trial. Furthermore, a single biomarker measurement will involve a combination of measurement-error, natural short-term variation over a daily time-period, variation over time periods of weeks and months, and slower age-dependent changes over several years. This paper develops a statistical method that accounts for these latter concerns, and applies it to Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data collected by UK General Practitioners. It studies the associations between cardiovascular health outcomes and the within-person variances of eight routinely measured biomarkers. This involved Sequential Monte Carlo modeling to convert an individuals biomarker measurements (collected over months or years), into estimates for the biomarkers mean, linear age-dependent slope, within-person variance, and a variance due to variation on a daily time period or measurement errors. The result is a proof-of-principle that UK primary care Electronic Health Records (from CPRD) can be effectively used for this purpose. After adjusting for mean biomarker values, clear associations were found between mortality or cardiovascular disease risks and within-person variances for 6 of 8 biomarkers.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
6
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.5%
9
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
14
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
16
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
19
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%