Back

Drug-Associated Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Maas, K.; Brewer, C.; Chai, A.; Park, D.; Martin-Pozo, M.; Phillips, E.; Mukherjee, E. M.

2026-05-05 dermatology
10.64898/2026.05.04.26352179 medRxiv
Show abstract

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating, inflammatory skin disorder. Medications have been reported in association with cases of new-onset HS or exacerbation of existing disease; however, the extent of this risk is unclear. We queried the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) from 2003-2023 to identify drug-specific reporting signals for HS. We stratified reports by whether HS was listed as an indication (Drug-Worsened, DW) or not (Drug-Induced, DI) to distinguish disease flares from de novo disease. Primary suspect drugs with > 3 HS reports were included. Disproportionality was quantified using reporting odds ratio (ROR) with Wald 95% confidence intervals (CI). Time-to-onset was also evaluated. We identified 5,529 HS reports: 3,725 DW and 1,804 DI. Females comprised 63% (mean age 41) and the US was the top reporting country (81.8% DW; 53.66% DI). In the DI group, statistically significant signals were observed for immunomodulators also used to treat HS including adalimumab (n=506, ROR= 12.6 [11.3-14.0]) infliximab (n=108, ROR=8.2 [6.7-10.0]), and secukinumab (n=79, ROR=6.6 [5.2-8.2]), consistent with paradoxical reactions. Median time-to-onset was 22 days for secukinumab, compared to 312 and 319 days for adalimumab and infliximab. Signals were also identified for isotretinoin (n=28, ROR= 6.2 [4.2-8.9]), and for antineoplastic agents including cytarabine (n=25, ROR= 24.7 [16.6-36.6]) and omacetaxine (n=8; ROR= 7416 [CI 2923-18816]), which may reflect reported eccrine hidradenitis. In the DW group, adalimumab (n=2967), secukinumab (n=67), and infliximab (n=57) predominated but displayed lower RORs (0.72-1.4), likely reflecting indication bias. While mechanisms of drug-associated HS require further clarification, our findings demonstrate significant associations and highlight the importance of dermatologic monitoring when initiating certain agents.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.4%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
6
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
8
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
10
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
15
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
23
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
29
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%