Back

Sensitivity of tree species demography to climate and competition across their range

Vieira, W.; MacDonald, A.; Gravel, D.

2026-05-06 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.03.722548 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Theory predicts that demographic performance should peak at the core of species ranges and decrease toward their limits. Yet, empirical correlations between population growth rate and species distribution remain weak for most tree species. Part of the problem may arise from the difficulty of integrating multiple demographic processes across the complex life cycle of a forest, and from the significant variability among individuals and locations. It remains unclear if the mismatch between performance and distribution arises from modelling limitations or if climate is simply a poor predictor of species performance across distributions. Here, rather than asking whether demographic performance correlates with species distributions, we ask how climate and competition jointly shape population growth rate for 31 tree species across eastern North America. By combining flexible nonlinear hierarchical models for growth, survival, and recruitment with explicit uncertainty propagation, we use Integral Projection Models to address key gaps in previous studies. Perturbation analyses revealed that population growth rate was consistently more sensitive to mean annual temperature than to conspecific or heterospecific competition across all species. We further examined how sensitivities to climate and competition varied across species thermal ranges. The dominance of climate over competition increased toward both cold and hot range limits, while sensitivity to competition generally declined from cold to hot limits. Notably, these patterns emerged along the continental thermal gradient shared across species rather than within each species individual range, suggesting that range-edge demographic responses may arise as a community-level phenomenon. Across species, the largest source of variability remained the local plot conditions captured by random effects, likely reflecting differences in soil conditions, drainage, and disturbance history. Together, these results may provide a mechanistic pathway underlying the performance declines predicted by range-limit theories, and offer a basis for understanding how forest populations and communities may reorganize in response to ongoing climate change and shifting disturbance regimes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
3
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.9%
7
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
11
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
17
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
23
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%