Reverse engineering the fatally cross-reactive A3A TCR to decouple potency and specificity
McCarthy, J. V.; Heroven, A. C.; Ifashe, K.; Fellermeyer, M.; Hudson, D.; Cioaca, R.; Quastel, M. N.; Yang, Y.; Cagiada, M.; Dragonov, S. D.; Thorpe, C. J.; Pinto-Fernandez, A.; Greenshields-Watson, A.; Gillespie, G. M.; Deane, C. M.; Fernandes, R. A.
Show abstract
T cell receptor (TCR) affinity enhancement can introduce off-target cross-reactivity with life-threatening consequences, as illustrated by the MAGE-A3-specific A3A TCR, which caused fatal cardiotoxicity through recognition of a Titin-derived peptide. Here, we reconstructed the cross-reactivity landscape by reverse-engineering A3A toward its wild-type precursor, generating intermediate variants in which engineered CDR2 residues are systematically reverted to the wild-type sequence. Reverting just two engineered residues yields a receptor, v9, that retains MAGE-A3 cytotoxicity comparable to A3A while eliminating Titin and other acquired cross-reactivities. Structurally, these substitutions reduce CDR2-MHC contacts and disrupt an intra-TCR CDR2-CDR3{beta} interaction, propagating conformational changes across CDR3 loops that reshape peptide engagement without altering docking geometry. These results demonstrate that mutations outside the peptide-contacting CDR3 loops can allosterically reconfigure antigen specificity and establish simple stepwise reverse engineering to wild-type as a strategy for correcting TCR cross-reactivity.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Opposing effects of pre-existing antibody and memory T cell help on the dynamics of recall germinal centers 94%
- Immunological imprinting shapes the specificity of human antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants 94%
- Nucleotide-dependent conformational changes direct peptide export by the transporter associated with antigen processing 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.