Back

Membrane voltage multistability in coupled glial cells

Janjic, P.; Solev, D.; Zhou, M.; Kocarev, L.

2026-05-06 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.03.722503 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Growing interest to describe the electrical behavior of glial cells, mainly astrocytes, in intact brain tissue poses more and more challenges to commonly accepted belief they only respond in a linear manner in uptake of the excess of extracellular potassium and maintenance of their network equipotentiality. Their highly conductive mutual interconnections via gap junction (GJ) connections introduce yet another class of nonlinear elements. As more studies report nonlinearities in membrane voltage Vm dependence of both, the membrane and junctional conductances, the need to formulate minimal dynamical models of their transient behavior is getting more acute. Since ODE models of coupled cells, even in simplest 1-d arrays, require simplified descriptions and small set of parameters, rare quantitative studies on glia makes the task even more difficult. This study attempts to qualify a self-coupled cell, or a glial cell coupled to fixed voltage as useful system for detecting the nature of instabilities and transitions coming from coupling. In a novel biophysical model of coupled astrocyte, we introduce nonlinear kinetics of deactivation for large junctional voltages for the first time. We found that N-shaped nonlinearities and corresponding fold structure in the vector field of isolated cell serves as a baseline on top of which coupling nonlinearities enrich the bifurcation picture. Numerical simulations of 1-d array of coupled astrocytes show that coupling increases the propensity of astrocytic Vm to bistability and front propagation. We believe that presented illustrations of possible effects of coupling nonlinearities will motivate neurobiologists to further explore their impact in disease. Significance statementTransient changes in membrane voltage of glial cells may produce significant transient voltage difference between directly coupled cells. Nonlinear steady-state conductance of their interconnection elements, the gap junctions, introduce nonlinear current profiles which are very difficult to measure and quantitate using the available methods due to marked permeability of the junctions and leakiness of glial membrane in general. We propose a minimal model of glial membrane extended with a self-coupled feedback loop, which under realistic simplifying assumptions could serve for qualitative analysis of the impact of coupling, on the stability of resting membrane voltage. Neuronal cells of the brain and spinal cord cannot exist and function without supportive and neuromodulatory functions of the diverse population of glial cells. This applies to virtually all physiological processes on cell level - from cell development, metabolic support, membrane signaling, slow molecular signal transduction, ion homeostasis, neurovascular coupling, myelination, to mention only a few, manifest neuro-glial interaction. Even though all glial cell types are interconnected, the most abundant ones, the astrocytes are massively interconnected by gap junctions to form ordered networks. Electrically, astrocytic networks display membrane voltage equipotentiality, which is considered system-wide resting state for given neuro-glial circuit or unit. With molecular and cellular substrates of glial connectivity being slowly elucidated, network science and dynamical modeling are slowly "invading" that area with many important issues left open. In this study using classical dynamical systems approaches we give indications how nonlinear intercellular coupling between astrocytes affects physiological resting state and its instabilities compared to isolated, uncoupled cell. We strongly believe the suggested minimal model could fill the gap in ODE modeling of neuro-glial circuits, within broadest scope of hypothesis-driven research in cell-level neuroscience.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
19.0%
2
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.3%
3
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
4
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
6
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
11
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
18
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%