Back

Ethnic Inequalities in COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake Among Older Adults in Australia: A Nationwide Linked Data Study

Xu, P.; Khalatbari-Soltani, S.; Sheel, M.; Laaksonen, M. A.; Zhu, L.; Lin, Y.; Abdel Shaheed, C.; Sawan, M.; Mussagulova, A.; Gnjidic, D.; Patu, P.; Liu, B.; Stanaway, F. F.

2026-05-05 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.03.26351251 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundInternational evidence has documented ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake, but national evidence for Australia remains limited. We aimed to quantify ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the first 6 months of 2024 and examine retrospective trends in Dose 1-4 (2021-22) across detailed ethnic groups among older adults. MethodsWe conducted a nationwide cohort study of Australian residents aged [&ge;]75 years who were not Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (N=2,038,522) by linking the 2021 Census, Australian Immunisation Register, death, and migration data. Age-standardized uptake of any COVID-19 vaccine dose by ethnic group was calculated (Jan 1-June 30, 2024). Stratified descriptive analyses were conducted to explore intersections between ethnicity and other key sociodemographic characteristics. Uptake of Dose 1-4 during 2021-22 was also assessed across ethnic groups. ResultsIn the first 6 months of 2024, 31.1% of the cohort received a COVID-19 vaccine. Uptake was substantially lower in several ethnic groups, including Central Asian (<10.0%, 95% CI <10.0-10.7), North African and Middle Eastern (<10.0%, 95% CI <10.0-<10.0), Pasifika (13.0%, 95% CI 11.7-14.4), and South Eastern European (10.5%, 95% CI 10.3-10.7) groups. These differences persisted even among individuals born in Australia, with higher English proficiency, higher educational attainment, and living in less disadvantaged areas. Similar inequalities were observed across earlier vaccine doses. ConclusionsSubstantial ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 vaccination uptake persist among older Australians. Reliance on country of birth, language, or socioeconomic factors alone does not fully identify groups with the lowest uptake. Incorporating more detailed ethnicity information may improve identification of under-served groups and inform more targeted and culturally appropriate vaccination strategies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
18.4%
2
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.1%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
4
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.7%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
7
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
9
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
12
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
26
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%