Back

Ethnic Inequalities in COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake Among Older Adults in Australia: A Nationwide Linked Data Study

Xu, P.; Khalatbari-Soltani, S.; Sheel, M.; Laaksonen, M. A.; Zhu, L.; Lin, Y.; Abdel Shaheed, C.; Sawan, M.; Mussagulova, A.; Gnjidic, D.; Patu, P.; Liu, B.; Stanaway, F. F.

2026-05-05 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.03.26351251 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundInternational evidence has documented ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake, but national evidence for Australia remains limited. We aimed to quantify ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the first 6 months of 2024 and examine retrospective trends in Dose 1-4 (2021-22) across detailed ethnic groups among older adults. MethodsWe conducted a nationwide cohort study of Australian residents aged [&ge;]75 years who were not Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (N=2,038,522) by linking the 2021 Census, Australian Immunisation Register, death, and migration data. Age-standardized uptake of any COVID-19 vaccine dose by ethnic group was calculated (Jan 1-June 30, 2024). Stratified descriptive analyses were conducted to explore intersections between ethnicity and other key sociodemographic characteristics. Uptake of Dose 1-4 during 2021-22 was also assessed across ethnic groups. ResultsIn the first 6 months of 2024, 31.1% of the cohort received a COVID-19 vaccine. Uptake was substantially lower in several ethnic groups, including Central Asian (<10.0%, 95% CI <10.0-10.7), North African and Middle Eastern (<10.0%, 95% CI <10.0-<10.0), Pasifika (13.0%, 95% CI 11.7-14.4), and South Eastern European (10.5%, 95% CI 10.3-10.7) groups. These differences persisted even among individuals born in Australia, with higher English proficiency, higher educational attainment, and living in less disadvantaged areas. Similar inequalities were observed across earlier vaccine doses. ConclusionsSubstantial ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 vaccination uptake persist among older Australians. Reliance on country of birth, language, or socioeconomic factors alone does not fully identify groups with the lowest uptake. Incorporating more detailed ethnicity information may improve identification of under-served groups and inform more targeted and culturally appropriate vaccination strategies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.