Back

Deciphering the Genomic Landscape of Renal Cell Carcinoma Brain Metastases

Gok Yavuz, B.; Li, P.; Ovando-Ricardez, J. A.; La Ferlita, A.; Tse, J. W. T.; Hanalioglu, S.; Babaoglu, B.; Baylarov, B.; Norberg, L. M.; Chancoco, H. D.; Thompson, E. J.; Mut, M.; Soylemezoglu, F.; Huse, J. T.; Osunkoya, A. O.; Bilen, M. A.; Hasanov, M.; Jonasch, E.; Shih, D. J. H.; Hasanov, E.

2026-05-06 genetics
10.64898/2026.05.02.722447 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality, yet the genomic features associated with metastatic dissemination remain poorly understood. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on 72 RCC brain metastasis samples with matched normal. To identify candidate genomic alterations associated with brain metastasis, the genomic alterations detected in the brain metastases were compared against alterations in extracranial metastases from the MSK-ECM cohort (n=137) and primary RCC tumors from TCGA (n=432) by case-control analyses. Candidate alterations were also identified through matched-pair analyses comparing brain metastases with matched primary tumors or extracranial metastases from the same patient (n=25). A random survival forest model incorporating the candidate CNA events was developed to predict overall survival. The candidate CNAs were further evaluated using functional experimental data from MetMap and DepMap. Survival analyses were conducted to assess the prognostic relevance of these alterations. We identified recurrent CNAs enriched in RCC brain metastases, including 4q loss, 7p gain, 7q gain, 8p loss, 8q gain, 9p21.3 deletion, 12q15 amplification, and 14q loss. These alterations were associated with significantly poorer patient survival among RCC patients. A random survival forest model based on these CNA events stratified TCGA-KIRC patients into prognostically distinct risk groups (C-index = 0.64). Among the recurrent CNAs, 8p loss, 8q gain, 9p21.3 deletion were associated with increased incidence of brain metastases across multiple primary cancer types in xenograft mouse models. These alterations were also strongly associated with metastatic progression and poor prognosis across RCC, lung adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, and melanoma. These findings indicate a shared genomic basis for brain tropism and highlight the potential utility of copy-number alterations as biomarkers for risk stratification and clinical decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 5%
19.4%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.7%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.0%
5
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
2.0%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
14
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
17
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
18
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Experimental & Molecular Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%
29
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%