Back

Extracting Parsimonious Quantitative Predictors of Biological Effectiveness from 'First-Principles' Radiobiology: Application to the Mixed-Quality Problem

Yusufaly, T.; Transtrum, M.; Huang, L.; Sabok-Sayr, S.; Sgouros, G.; Hobbs, R.; Jia, X.

2026-05-06 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.02.722446 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Developing parsimonious, mechanism-aware quantitative models that predict how biological effectiveness changes with different modifiers remains, in general, an unsolved problem. Advances in radiobiological research have created a large knowledge base of first-principles mechanistic models of radiation response that, in principle, could accurately predict radiosensitivity across different experimental and clinical conditions. However, in practice these mechanistic models come with an overabundance of parameters, the majority of which are practically unidentifiable and, moreover, likely unnecessary if one simply wishes to predict how radiosensitivity changes for some specific modifier of interest. Nevertheless, determining which few details in the full mechanistic model are relevant for a given purpose, as well as how to remove any other extraneous details, remains a highly non-trivial task. In this study, we demonstrate the potential of model reduction, starting from a detailed mechanistic description, as a systematic strategy for deriving parsimonious, experimentally falsifiable radiobiological descriptors. As a proof-of-concept demonstration, we apply the Manifold Boundary Approximation Method (MBAM) to a Mechanistic Model of DNA Repair and Survival (MEDRAS), for the problem of cell survival prediction following an acute exposure. Our findings reveal that the complete MEDRAS model for an arbitrary mixed-quality exposure can be structurally simplified to a reduced three-parameter model for an effective uniform-quality, named MEDRAS-LPL. Additional MBAM analysis on MEDRAS-LPL identifies two boundaries in parameter space, corresponding to sparsely ionizing and densely ionizing radiation. Mapping of MEDRAS-LPL parameter space on to effective LQ space further demonstrates that parameters close to the sparsely ionizing boundary line up with expectations from the theory of dual radiation, while parameters close to the densely ionizing boundary line up with expectations from a purely linear model based on a target-theory description. Moreover, our formalism predicts enhanced synergistic interactions between sparsely ionizing and densely ionizing radiation beyond the Zaider Rossi model (ZRM) paradigm, in line with empirical observations. The results highlight the potential for using reduced-order models not only for predictive applications but also for generating novel hypotheses that can inform future experimental designs and optimization strategies in radiobiology.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.5%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
4
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
5
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.3%
9
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
10
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
13
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
21
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
24
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
25
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
26
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.0%
28
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
29
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
30
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.9%