Back

Distinct foraging goals shape floral resource use in a generalist solitary bee

Argueta-Guzman, M.; Gonzalez, B.; Van Pelt, N.; Dias de Almeida, A. C.; Jimenez Delgado, T.; Pena, L.; Hutchinson, M. C.; Palumbo Gaiarsa, M.

2026-05-06 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.02.722438 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A central challenge in characterizing species niches is ensuring that foraging data accurately capture both the resources used and their relative importance, and the role of resource abundance in shaping foraging patterns. Most studies infer diet breadth and resource-use patterns from observational records, yet such data can mask resource-specific decisions when animals forage with different goals. Here, we test this experimentally using individually identifiable bees in controlled resource communities to quantify foraging decisions between nectar (for sustenance) and pollen (for offspring provisioning). Combining observations, pollen DNA metabarcoding, and pollen microscopy, we show that observed visitation patterns misrepresent the floral resources most important for offspring provisioning, which ultimately determines offspring survival and population persistence. We further show that interaction patterns are structured from processes beyond resource abundance. Our results demonstrate that commonly used observational approaches can mischaracterize diet breadth, potentially challenging conclusions about species generalization.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.9%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.6%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.9%
5
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
6
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
11
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
15
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
19
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
21
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
22
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.5%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%