Back

AI-based discovery of functional boundaries in the human brain from intraoperative electrophysiology

Leszek, S.; Baker, M. R.; Klassen, B. T.; Jensen, M.; Ojeda Valencia, G.; Müller, K.-R.; Miller, K. J.

2026-05-04 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.02.26352297 medRxiv
Show abstract

Neurosurgical and neuromodulation therapies such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) require millimeter-level accuracy to effectively target functional brain regions. Yet, many neuroanatomical boundaries remain invisible to current imaging and electrophysiology methods, limiting precision and contributing to suboptimal patient outcomes. Here, we introduce a self-supervised artificial intelligence (AI) framework that learns to delineate functional subregions directly from the spectral content of intraoperative local field potential (LFP) recordings, without the need for predefined biomarkers or anatomical labels. The framework identifies physiologic structure across the full spectrum of the signal and, through explainable AI (XAI), reveals the specific frequency components underlying these distinctions. Validated in the subthalamic nucleus (STN), the model aligned with clinically defined borders and rediscovered known beta oscillations. Applied to the motor thalamus in tremor patients, it consistently identified functional transitions corresponding to the ventral oralis posterior (Vop) and ventral intermediate (Vim) nuclei--regions where conventional methods fail to provide reliable boundaries. To assess clinical relevance, physiologically defined clusters were functionally evaluated using monopolar review data at their first DBS clinic postoperative visit, demonstrating distinct stimulation-response profiles across clusters and linking electrophysiologic segmentation to clinically meaningful programming outcomes. These findings demonstrate that intraoperative LFP recordings can be transformed into both a real-time guidance resource and a data-driven platform for biomarker discovery, establishing a foundation for more precise, individualized neuromodulation therapies and advancing our understanding of functional brain organization.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.9%
2
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.7%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.7%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.7%
6
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
9
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
13
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
14
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
20
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
22
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
28
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%