Back

Decoupling of spatial scales in breast pathology reveals fractal-like nuclear organization emergent from tissue spatial architecture

Das, A.; Ahammer, H.; Prabhu, J. S.; Bhat, R.; Jolly, M. K.

2026-05-05 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.02.26352267 medRxiv
Show abstract

Quantitative biophysical signatures of nuclear spatial reorganisation across breast carcinoma progression remain insufficiently characterised. We apply two complementary fractal descriptors, Correlation dimension (Dc) and Minkowski dimension (Dm), to 4276 regions of interest across seven breast tissue subtypes from the BRACS dataset, validating observed dimensions against systematically constructed null spatial models to distinguish genuine structural organisation from geometric irregularity. All subtypes significantly exceed the complete spatial randomness baseline, confirming universal departure from random nuclear arrangement. The observed scaling is characterised as statistically monofractal within a bounded pre-fractal range. Invasive carcinoma uniquely fails to exceed the clustered null in Dc while simultaneously showing the weakest Dm null deviation, a dual convergence toward stochastic baselines consistent with the progressive removal of architectural constraints. Flat epithelial atypia exhibits a unique directional dissociation with the lowest Dc across all subtypes combined with high Dm null deviation, a co-occurrence not observed in any other subtype and geometrically consistent with decoupled nuclear spatial organisation at the centroid distribution and boundary morphology scales. Interpreted within a percolation-theoretic framework, the non-monotonic null deviation trajectory maps onto qualitative regime transitions, providing a physically grounded explanation for the observed discrimination profile across pathological transitions. These findings position fractal-like nuclear architecture as a potential descriptor for pre-malignant transitional states.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 10%
14.7%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
9
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
12
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
15
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
20
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
23
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%