Back

First occurrence of Corynespora cassiicola infecting chia plant in Bangladesh and its sensitivity to selected fungicides

Badhon, A. K.; Gupta, D. R.; Paul, S. K.; Ali, J.; Rahman, M. M.; Islam, T.

2026-05-06 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.05.01.722373 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) is an emerging crop in Bangladesh valued for its medicinal properties and economic significance. In March 2024, target spot-like symptoms were observed in an experimental chia field (24.75{degrees} N, 90.50{degrees} E) at Bangladesh Agricultural University in Mymensingh, Bangladesh with disease incidence ranging from 23% to 47% across approximately 0.25 ha. Initially appearing as brick-red spots, these symptoms developed into target-shaped concentric rings, affecting leaves, stems, and inflorescences. A total of 24 fungal isolates were recovered from infected tissue; two representative isolates (BGECh-3 and BGECh-4) were randomly selected for details characterization. Pathogen identity was established through morphological traits, multilocus phylogenetic analysis of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and elongation factor 1-alpha (EF-1) genes sequence, and pathogenicity confirmation through Kochs postulates, collectively identifying the causal agent as Corynespora cassiicola. The isolates demonstrated a broad host range, successfully infecting brinjal, chili, bottle gourd, country bean, tomato, and soybean. In vitro fungicide sensitivity assays with seven commercial fungicides showed that both isolates were highly sensitive to Goldzim (50% carbendazim), which completely inhibited mycelial growth at 10 {micro}g mL-{superscript 1}. Conza (10% Hexaconazole) and Amister top (18.2% azoxystrobin + 11.4% difenoconazole) reduced growth by up to 85% and 67%, respectively at equal concentration. Other fungicides showed comparatively lower efficacy even at higher concentrations. This study represents the first report of target spot disease of chia caused by C. cassiicola in Bangladesh and provides insights for effective disease management strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
29.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
3
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
5
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
6
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
8
Journal of Economic Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
10
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
14
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
16
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
21
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
25
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%