Back

Massively parallel reporter assay-informed modeling improves prediction of context-specific enhancer-gene regulatory interactions

DeGroat, W.; Kreimer, A.

2026-05-05 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.01.722242 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Enhancers are cis-regulatory elements that drive context-specific gene expression, yet their target genes and modes of action remain largely unresolved. Because most disease-associated variants lie in non-coding regulatory DNA, accurate, cell type-specific enhancer-gene (E-G) mapping is essential for understanding genetic risk. However, current E-G prediction frameworks lack the resolution to capture such context-specific interactions. Massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) provide measurement of cis-regulatory activity, but their integration into genome-scale E-G models has been limited. Here, we introduce MPRabc, an MPRA-informed model that improves E-G interaction prediction. MPRabc integrates predicted MPRA activity, sequence-derived regulatory features, epigenomic signals, and three-dimensional chromatin contact maps with CRISPR-based perturbation training data. Benchmarking against validated regulatory interactions shows that MPRabc outperforms state-of-the-art models. We generated high-resolution E-G networks for K562, HepG2, and hiPSC cell lines and applied a graph-based framework to identify regulatory architecture, map trait-associated variants and expression quantitative trait loci, and resolve transcription factor drivers of enhancer activity. Across contexts, we accurately recovered lineage-defining regulatory programs, including GATA1::TAL1 in K562, HNF1A/B in HepG2, and POU factor circuits in hiPSCs. Together, these results establish MPRA-informed modeling as a scalable strategy for decoding enhancer function and linking non-coding variants to gene regulatory mechanisms across cellular contexts.

Published in Nucleic Acids Research (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.