Back

Colocalization and discordance between plasma and brain protein quantitative trait loci

Cheng, Y.; Zhang, W.; Lu, T.

2026-05-05 genetics
10.64898/2026.05.01.722237 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Studies of protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) provide opportunities to interpret complex trait genetics and identify potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Circulating proteins are commonly used in pQTL studies due to the accessibility of blood-based measurements, but their levels may not always reflect regulation in disease-relevant tissues. We assessed colocalization and discordance between plasma and dorsal prefrontal cortex cis-pQTLs using data from four large-scale studies and investigated their implications for downstream analyses. Across the proteins examined, at most 80% of the cis-pQTLs showed evidence of colocalization. Among the colocalized loci, approximately 20% exhibited opposite directions of genetic effects. We characterized tissue-specific gene expression profiles based on data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression project. Proteins with colocalized cis-pQTLs were more likely to have high gene expression levels in systemic tissues and immune cells, whereas the remaining proteins were more likely to have high expression in brain tissues. We conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using neuroticism as an illustrative outcome to compare effect estimates derived using instruments from different pQTL studies. MR analyses identified 13 proteins significantly associated with neuroticism, including six with opposite effect directions between plasma and dorsal prefrontal cortex, highlighting the importance of tissue context. Overall, circulating pQTLs remain informative for proteins from systemic and immune pathways, while incorporating tissue-specific data may provide additional insight for proteins with more localized expression. Considering multiple tissue contexts may refine the interpretation of protein-trait associations and may improve the prioritization of candidate targets.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.2%
2
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.3%
4
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.2%
6
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
8
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.2%
10
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
13
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
21
Journal of the Endocrine Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
22
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%