Back

Weber's law of proportional processing influences coevolution of ornaments and preferences in models of sexual selection

Bullough, K.; Kelley, L.; Kuijper, B.

2026-05-05 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.01.722204 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mate preferences are often influenced by the magnitude of sexual signals, which are presumed to indicate underlying aspects of signaller quality. Although the perception of these signals depends on sensory processes, the role of perceptual adaptations and constraints in mate assessment is frequently overlooked. Many sensory systems follow Webers law of proportional processing, where discrimination between signals is based upon their proportional, or relative, difference rather than their absolute difference. Because preference strength varies with relative trait magnitude, Webers law could strongly influence sexual selection, changing the coevolution of traits and preferences. Here, we explore the consequences of Webers law for sexual selection using individual-based models, applying Scalar Utility Theory to mate choice. We investigate the coevolution of male ornaments and female preferences under both Fisherian and good genes scenarios, as well as scrutinizing the sexual selection of multiple ornaments and preferences. Including Webers law in these models either reduced ornament exaggeration, or promoted exaggeration and diversification of ornaments and preferences, depending on the costs of choice and how rapidly female survival decreases when preferences evolve away from the naturally selected optimum. These results highlight the importance of perception and cognitive processing in shaping sexual selection and its evolutionary impacts.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.4%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.5%
3
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
5
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
6
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.0%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.3%
8
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
12
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
16
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
17
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
19
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
22
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.6%
24
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%