Back

Decoupling smoothness, accuracy, and kinematic invariance in biological reach: an ablation study of an equilibrium-point controller in a 34-muscle arm model

Kobayashi, J.

2026-05-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.01.722167 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Engineering controllers solve musculoskeletal reaching but typically violate the kinematic invariants of human reach: bell-shaped speed profiles, near-straight paths, and a peak-velocity time at 40-50 % of movement duration. For the MyoSuite myoArm (20-DoF, 34 Hill-type muscles) we implement a biologically motivated controller combining (i) Feldmans {lambda}-equilibrium-point hypothesis, (ii) a minimum-jerk virtual trajectory{lambda} (t), (iii) a 200 ms visuomotor correction, and (iv) {gamma}-compatible spinal reflexes (Ia, Ib, reciprocal inhibition). Across n = 50 randomised targets the full controller is practically equivalent to an endpoint-PD + spinal baseline (Cartesian PD descending command paired with the same spinal reflex layer; see [&#167;]2.6) on minimum tip error (Cohens d = +0.03; paired Wilcoxon detects only a +10.6 mm residual against a {approx} 100 mm absolute error, well within a pre-defined {+/-}20 mm equivalence margin) while halving peak speed (1.78 vs 3.90 m s-1, d = -7.39, p < 10-15) and reducing jerk by 40 % (d = -1.74). Only the variant with stretch reflexes brings the velocity-peak ratio into the canonical human range (0.40-0.50). Straightness stays below the human reference, so we frame the result as a partial reproduction of the bell-shape and smoothness invariants, not full human-like reach. A factorial ablation (n = 20) decomposes the contributions: virtual trajectory primarily controls smoothness, visuomotor feedback primarily controls accuracy, and reflexes primarily control velocity-peak timing, with two quantifiable secondary effects reported explicitly. An attempted online cerebellar correction in joint or {lambda} space did not improve performance, consistent with -- but not by itself demonstrating -- the cerebellum as a slow inverse-model learner rather than a within-trial steering controller. We release a deterministic_reset patch for a seeding bug in the MyoSuite reach environments (in the versions tested). The result is mechanistic rather than task-optimal: it attributes separable kinematic axes to distinct biological control layers in a 34-muscle arm.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 3%
22.3%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.6%
3
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.2%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
8
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.7%
10
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
13
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
15
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
18
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.9%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%