Back

The first digital twin of Enterococcus faecium metabolism reproduces high-throughput phenotyping data

Rasmi, D. S.; Krishnan, J.; Hashem, Y. A.; Palsson, B.; Khashef, M. T.; Monk, J.; Aziz, R. K.

2026-05-06 systems biology
10.64898/2026.05.01.720924 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Enterococci are Gram-positive opportunistic pathogens responsible for a wide range of nosocomial infections. One enterococcocal species, Enterococcus faecium, is steadily increasing in prevalence and has been listed among major multidrug-resistant ESKAPE pathogens. To gain systems-level insights into its metabolism and support discovery of potential therapeutic targets, we constructed iDR479, a comprehensive manually curated genome-scale metabolic model (GEM) to serve as a digital twin for E. faecium TX0016 (strain DO). The reconstruction was curated through extensive homology searches and literature evidence, and further refined and gap-filled through experimental validation. Phenotypic profiling using Biolog microarrays enabled assessment of carbon source utilization, while amino acid leave-out growth assays allowed the evaluation of auxotrophies. The final refined model is 100% accurate in predicting amino acid auxotrophy and 85% accurate in predicting growth on sole carbon sources. Discrepancies between model predictions and experimental phenotypes identified specific knowledge gaps across metabolic pathways, including unresolved carbon source utilization phenotypes, e.g., psicose, sorbitol, and palatinose utilization. Those gaps will guided future experimental characterization. Additionally, gene essentiality analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive capacity of iDR479 model. Since no experimental gene essentiality data are currently available for E. faecium, model predictions were compared against Tn-seq experimental results from E. faecalis MMH594. Under simulated rich medium conditions, iDR479 achieved 86.7% concordance with the experimental essentiality results of E. faecalis MMH594. iDR479 thus provides a framework for studying E. faecium, offers insights into its metabolic network, and serves as a source for guiding future research and identification of therapeutic targets.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.6%
3
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
4
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
8
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
11
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
20
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
24
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%