Back

Metagenomics for bacterial spot pathogen and virulence factor tracking for Ohio fresh market tomato and pepper production

Toth, H.; Klass, T. L.; Roman-reyna, V.; Rotondo, F.; Francis, D. M.; Rodriguez, M.; Miller, S. A.; Jacobs, J. M.

2026-05-06 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.01.717695 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacterial spot is a consistent threat to global tomato and pepper productions; however, Ohios fresh market production currently lacks the updated surveillance data necessary to provide accurate management solutions. While traditional diagnostics focus on identification of a single causal agent, shotgun metagenomic sequencing (MGS) offers a comprehensive view of the infection court. An assignment-first MGS workflow was developed and validated in this study, utilizing Kraken2 databases to extract Xanthomonas species associated with bacterial spot and to characterize the microbial communities of bacterial spot in Ohio production systems. Through in silico spiking experiments, thresholds were established for bacterial spot identification. Species and pathovar identification via average nucleotide identity (ANI) remained accurate at abundance as low as 0.1%. A minimum of 2% Xanthomonas reads were required for high genome completeness (BUSCO >90%) and 3% for reliable type III secretion system (T3SS) effector profiling. Analysis of 63 samples from fresh-market production fields identified Xanthomonas hortorum pv. gardneri, Xanthomonas euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria, and Xanthomonas arboricola residing in symptomatic samples, alongside other taxa including Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas. Phylogenetic comparisons of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) were comparable to whole genome sequences (WGS) from the same samples, supporting the reliability of culture-independent diagnostics. These results provide a robust framework for utilizing metagenomics as a diagnostic tool, expanding our knowledge of bacterial spot population structure in Ohio, and uncovering the bacterial communities associated with bacterial spot.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.2%
2
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.5%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.2%
4
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
6
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
8
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
11
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
13
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
14
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
15
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
29
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%