Back

Post-EVT CTP as a Patient-Selection Tool for Adjuvant Therapy: Review, Meta-Analysis, and Clinical Threshold Framework

Eichel, R.; Teitcher, M.; Mausbach, S.; Poplavska, A.; Shqair, S.; Eichel, R.; Ben-David, E.; Borodetsky, V.; Bornstein, N. M.

2026-05-04 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.01.26352264 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and PurposeDespite high rates of macrovascular recanalization, approximately half of patients with large vessel occlusion stroke fail to achieve functional independence after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Residual tissue-level perfusion abnormalities on post-procedural CT perfusion (CTP) may indicate futile recanalization and inform selection for adjuvant therapy. We synthesized post-EVT CTP thresholds, summarized acquisition timing, and discussed implications for patient selection in trials of intra-arterial thrombolysis, antithrombotics, and neuroprotection, limited to studies performing perfusion imaging after EVT. MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (January 2018-April 2026) for studies performing perfusion imaging after EVT, reporting [&ge;]1 quantitative CTP parameter with functional or neurological outcome, and enrolling [&ge;]10 patients; pre-EVT CTP studies were excluded. Functional independence with versus without post-EVT hypoperfusion was pooled using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects. Individual patient data from our prospective Cerebrolysin proof-of-concept cohort (N=18) were integrated. ResultsNine post-EVT perfusion imaging studies (497 patients) met inclusion criteria. Residual hypoperfusion occurred in 21-53% of angiographically successful reperfusions and was associated with lower odds of functional independence (pooled OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.17-0.33; I{superscript 2}=29%). A Tmax >6 s volume <3.5 mL at 30-90 minutes post-EVT was the most consistently validated threshold (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.6-7.8). In our cohort, an ischemic core (rCBF <30%) of 0 mL versus any detectable residual core was associated with markedly higher odds of independence (OR 27.5, 95% CI 1.0-746 with continuity correction; {rho}=0.77, p=0.003). The optimal CTP acquisition window is 30-120 minutes post-EVT. ConclusionsPost-EVT CTP outperforms modified TICI grading for predicting functional outcome and identifies biologically distinct subgroups for adjuvant therapy selection. Standardized post-EVT CTP at 30-120 minutes, applied with the proposed threshold framework, should be used for eligibility and stratification in future trials of intra-arterial thrombolysis, antithrombotics, and neuroprotection.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
4
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
5
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
13
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%