Back

Inpatient diagnostic odysseys in rare diseases: a nationwide audited Orphanet ICD-10 DRG/GRD-IR analysis in Chile, 2019-2024

Gomez-Vargas, G. A.; Repetto, G. M.; Bravo, L.; Castillo-Laborde, C.; Delgado, I.; Matute, I.

2026-05-03 health informatics
10.64898/2026.05.01.26352213 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRare diseases (RD; enfermedades poco frecuentes, EPoF, in Chilean policy terminology) collectively affect 3.5-5.9% of the population and are associated with long diagnostic trajectories. Chile lacks a reproducible national operational definition for identifying RD in administrative hospital data. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational analysis of Chilean GRD-IR events (IR-29301 version) for 2019-2024 released through FONASA Datos Abiertos, covering hospital discharges and major ambulatory surgery reported by 72 public establishments for FONASA-covered persons. The canonical analytical cohort contained 5,779,482 DRG events in 4,027,921 linked patients. We constructed a Chilean Orphanet-ICD-10 homologation and audited it through an agentic human-in-the-loop pipeline, yielding a conservative RD operational catalogue (434 final ICD-10 codes in the KEEP + MAP_TO_SPECIFIC_ORPHA scenario). RD-coded DRG events were labeled as observed inpatient odysseys when at least one prior DRG event existed for the same patient. We quantified prior events, DRG-observed inpatient trajectory time, nonspecific prior diagnoses, DRG weight, and bridge-code associations. Bridge-code enrichment was estimated using patient-level Fisher exact tests with Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery correction; event-level estimates were retained as sensitivity analyses. ResultsThe audited conservative catalogue identified 55,284 primary-diagnosis RD-coded DRG events in 45,784 patients and 374,866 RD-coded events in any diagnostic field. We characterized 63,685 observed inpatient odyssey cases in 25,648 unique patients across 371 audited RD ICD-10 codes. Median DRG-observed inpatient trajectory time to RD-coded diagnosis was 241 days, and mean prior events per odyssey was 8.1. Bridge-code analysis identified 616 associations with support [&ge;] 10 patients and 390 with q < 0.05; 350 significant associations were no-same-code administrative trajectory signals. These signals varied in interpretation, including clinically plausible precursors, diagnostic refinement, and care-process bridges. The Odyssey Index reordered conditions relative to raw prior-event counts, separating high-volume entities from stronger trajectory signatures. ConclusionsTo our knowledge, we provide the first nationwide audited and reproducible characterization of inpatient RD diagnostic odysseys in Latin America using administrative hospital data. The framework supports trajectory surveillance, registry design, quality-control analyses, and prioritization of candidate signals for prospective clinical validation under Chiles Law 21,743. Bridge-code associations should be interpreted as statistically enriched administrative signals, not as validated causal or clinical pathways. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=112 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26352213v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (57K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@42593borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f0690aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@803365org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ae41af_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Graphical abstract. Updated canonical FONASA DRG/GRD-IR 2019-2024 cohort, audited RD catalogue, odyssey cohort, and bridge-code signal summary. C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
2
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.9%
3
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
4
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
6
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
9
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
10
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
12
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
15
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
19
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
26
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%