Back

Using HiFi Long-Read Whole Genome Sequencing To Enhance Diagnosis In Patients With Subfertility And/Or Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Teo, J. X.; Cheawsamoot, C.; Kim, D.; Goh, J. C.-Y.; Kam, S.; Chan, S. S.-M.; Yang, L.; Liu, S.; Chua, K. P.; Cheng, W.; Ma, G.-C.; Chang, T.-Y.; Lin, Y.-S.; Wu, K.-M.; Yu, E. J.; Kim, Y.; Seong, M.-W.; Thuwanut, P.; Tuntiviriyapun, P.; Suebthawinkul, C.; Srichomthong, C.; Chetruengchai, W.; Kanlayaprasit, S.; Wongong, R.; Korlach, J.; Lee, J.-S.; Chen, M.; Hwang, S.; Lim, W. K.; Shotelersuk, V.; Jamuar, S. S.

2026-05-08 sexual and reproductive health
10.64898/2026.05.01.26352136 medRxiv
Show abstract

Subfertility and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) affect a significant proportion of couples worldwide. Genetic causes can be seen in up to 30% of these individuals but require multiple genetic tests, which often impede a comprehensive work up. Newer genomic technologies, such as PacBio HiFi long read sequencing (LRS) can detect most subclasses of variations (such as structural rearrangement, monogenic disorders) through one single test. In this multicenter study, we enrolled couples with unexplained subfertility and/or RPL and performed HiFi LRS to determine the underlying genetic etiology. Participants were recruited using a standardized inclusion/ exclusion criteria to rule out other known causes of subfertility and/or RPL. 96 individuals were recruited across the 5 sites. Average age of participants was 36 years (range 30-46 years). Among the 84 individuals who completed sequencing, 4.8% were identified with a likely genetic diagnosis and variants of uncertain significance were identified in another 14.2% of individuals. One individual was identified with an ACMG secondary finding, and while multiple carriers for recessive genetic disorders were identified, none of the couples were identified to be at increased risk. This study highlights the utility of performing genomic sequencing in couples with unexplained subfertility and/or RPL, with 1 in 10 couples harboring a clinically significant variant. In addition, use of HiFi LRS allowed for characterization of different subclasses of genomic variations through a single test. Future studies, including exploring the cost effectiveness and resource utilization of LRS as first line test, will help in optimizing care for such couples. TWEETABLE STATEMENTA single long-read genome sequencing test can consolidate multiple genetic investigations and uncover clinically relevant causes in couples with unexplained subfertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. AT A GLANCEO_LIWhy was this study conducted? O_LIMany couples with subfertility and recurrent pregnancy loss remain undiagnosed after multiple conventional genetic tests C_LIO_LIExisting workflows require sequential testing and may miss complex genomic variants C_LI C_LIO_LIWhat are the key findings? O_LILong-read genome sequencing identified clinically relevant variants in [~]1 in 10 couples with unexplained subfertility or recurrent pregnancy loss C_LIO_LIA single assay enabled detection of multiple variant types, including structural and sequence variants C_LI C_LIO_LIWhat does this study add to what is already known? O_LIDemonstrates feasibility of a unified genomic testing approach in a real-world multicenter cohort C_LIO_LISupports a potential shift from fragmented testing toward a single comprehensive genomic workflow C_LI C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
11
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
12
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
13
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
14
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
16
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
23
Science Immunology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%