Back

Using HiFi Long-Read Whole Genome Sequencing To Enhance Diagnosis In Patients With Subfertility And/Or Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Teo, J. X.; Cheawsamoot, C.; Kim, D.; Goh, J. C.-Y.; Kam, S.; Chan, S. S.-M.; Yang, L.; Liu, S.; Chua, K. P.; Cheng, W.; Ma, G.-C.; Chang, T.-Y.; Lin, Y.-S.; Wu, K.-M.; Yu, E. J.; Kim, Y.; Seong, M.-W.; Thuwanut, P.; Tuntiviriyapun, P.; Suebthawinkul, C.; Srichomthong, C.; Chetruengchai, W.; Kanlayaprasit, S.; Wongong, R.; Korlach, J.; Lee, J.-S.; Chen, M.; Hwang, S.; Lim, W. K.; Shotelersuk, V.; Jamuar, S. S.

2026-05-08 sexual and reproductive health
10.64898/2026.05.01.26352136 medRxiv
Show abstract

Subfertility and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) affect a significant proportion of couples worldwide. Genetic causes can be seen in up to 30% of these individuals but require multiple genetic tests, which often impede a comprehensive work up. Newer genomic technologies, such as PacBio HiFi long read sequencing (LRS) can detect most subclasses of variations (such as structural rearrangement, monogenic disorders) through one single test. In this multicenter study, we enrolled couples with unexplained subfertility and/or RPL and performed HiFi LRS to determine the underlying genetic etiology. Participants were recruited using a standardized inclusion/ exclusion criteria to rule out other known causes of subfertility and/or RPL. 96 individuals were recruited across the 5 sites. Average age of participants was 36 years (range 30-46 years). Among the 84 individuals who completed sequencing, 4.8% were identified with a likely genetic diagnosis and variants of uncertain significance were identified in another 14.2% of individuals. One individual was identified with an ACMG secondary finding, and while multiple carriers for recessive genetic disorders were identified, none of the couples were identified to be at increased risk. This study highlights the utility of performing genomic sequencing in couples with unexplained subfertility and/or RPL, with 1 in 10 couples harboring a clinically significant variant. In addition, use of HiFi LRS allowed for characterization of different subclasses of genomic variations through a single test. Future studies, including exploring the cost effectiveness and resource utilization of LRS as first line test, will help in optimizing care for such couples. TWEETABLE STATEMENTA single long-read genome sequencing test can consolidate multiple genetic investigations and uncover clinically relevant causes in couples with unexplained subfertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. AT A GLANCEO_LIWhy was this study conducted? O_LIMany couples with subfertility and recurrent pregnancy loss remain undiagnosed after multiple conventional genetic tests C_LIO_LIExisting workflows require sequential testing and may miss complex genomic variants C_LI C_LIO_LIWhat are the key findings? O_LILong-read genome sequencing identified clinically relevant variants in [~]1 in 10 couples with unexplained subfertility or recurrent pregnancy loss C_LIO_LIA single assay enabled detection of multiple variant types, including structural and sequence variants C_LI C_LIO_LIWhat does this study add to what is already known? O_LIDemonstrates feasibility of a unified genomic testing approach in a real-world multicenter cohort C_LIO_LISupports a potential shift from fragmented testing toward a single comprehensive genomic workflow C_LI C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.0%
2
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.5%
4
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
5
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.0%
7
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
8
Human Reproduction
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
10
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
13
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
16
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
Journal of Medical Genetics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
21
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Placenta
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
27
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
30
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%