Back

Changes in the Transcriptome and Synthetic Lethal Dependencies Following KRAS Mutant Expression Reveal Profound Tissue-Specificity

Martin, T. D.; Choi, M. Y.; McBride, J.; Elledge, S. J.

2026-05-04 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.30.721990 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oncogenic KRAS mutations exhibit a striking tissue-restricted tropism, occurring with high frequency in pancreatic, colorectal, and lung adenocarcinomas while remaining rare in other lineages. The molecular basis for why these specific tissues are uniquely permissive to KRAS transformation, and how this context shapes therapeutic vulnerabilities, remains poorly defined. Here, we utilized CRISPR-mediated genome engineering to generate endogenous, conditional KRAS-mutant isogenic cell line models across three primary permissive lineages (lung, colon, and pancreas) and the non-permissive breast lineage. Integrated genome-wide CRISPR fitness screens and comparative transcriptome analyses revealed that KRAS-driven synthetic lethal (SL) dependencies are profoundly shaped by their tissue of origin. Strikingly, we observed minimal overlap in SL hits across lineages, with only three genes shared among the permissive lines, suggesting that the KRAS oncogene operates through divergent, context-specific genetic networks. Mechanistically, we show that KRAS activation induces a universal MYC-driven metabolic signature, but the specific machinery required to sustain this state is lineage-restricted. We identified a dependency on the diphthamide synthesis pathway to maintain translational fidelity amidst a KRAS-induced hyper-translational state. These findings demonstrate that even when driven by the same oncogene, tumors exhibit distinct regulatory landscapes and unique genetic vulnerabilities. Our results provide a framework for developing lineage-aware therapeutic strategies, moving beyond universal KRAS inhibition toward targeted interventions tailored to a tumors specific tissue context. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTWhile KRAS mutations drive a significant portion of human malignancies, their prevalence is strikingly restricted to specific lineages, namely pancreatic, colorectal, and lung tissues. This tissue-restricted tropism suggests that oncogenic KRAS does not operate in a vacuum but requires a permissive, tissue-specific molecular landscape to sustain tumorigenesis. By integrating comparative transcriptome analyses with functional genomics across four isogenic lineages, we demonstrate that KRAS synthetic lethal dependencies are not universal but are hardwired to the cell of origin. This work establishes a framework for tissue lineage-aware oncology, shifting treatment paradigms from targeting the KRAS mutation alone to targeting the specific genetic networks, defined by the tissue of origin, that sustain KRAS-driven growth.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.1%
2
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
6.2%
4
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.9%
7
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.6%
8
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
10
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
11
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
12
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
13
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.7%
19
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
21
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
23
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Genes & Development
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%