Back

Dietary and gut microbial variation among urban and rural populations of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus)

Giancarli, S. M.; Kasprowicz, A. E.; Balman, M.; Clark, R. D.; Kupchella, S. C.; Lacy, L. J.; Moeller, A.; Suzuki, T.; Phifer-Rixey, M.

2026-05-02 microbiology
10.64898/2026.04.30.721966 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Urbanization can result in shifts in abiotic and biotic factors, including temperature, pollution, habitat type, pathogens, and diet, among others. These shifts can, in turn, shape the ecological and evolutionary trajectory of urban wildlife. The gut microbiota has the potential to mediate host-environment interactions, especially in the context of diet and disease, and thus may be a useful lens for understanding the impacts of urbanization. House mice (Mus musculus domesticus) are a cosmopolitan human commensal with a wealth of genomic and metagenomic resources. Here, we investigate patterns of variation in diet and gut microbial diversity, community composition, and function using a paired urban-rural sampling design in house mice from three metro regions in the eastern United States. First, using stable isotope analysis, we found that habitat--urban versus rural--was a major driver of variation in {delta}15N, suggesting a diet richer in animal proteins in cities. Next, using short-read sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, we found that urban mice have lower gut microbial taxonomic diversity than their rural counterparts. We also found that community composition varied among urban and rural habitats, with differences largely reflecting shifts among closely related taxa. In particular, Prevotellaceae, a family known to be responsive to dietary quality, was differentially abundant, with lower abundance in urban habitats. Finally, we found differentiation in a few predicted microbial functions across habitat, primarily related to metabolism. Together, data across three independent sampling regions provide strong evidence that urbanization has the potential to shape the diet and the microbiome of house mice.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
4
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
5
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.6%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
17
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
22
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%