Back

Mechanics-Driven Emergence of Mesenchymal Migration Features

Louviaux, N.; Cheddadi, I.; Verdier, C.; Stephanou, A.; Chauviere, A.

2026-05-04 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.30.721940 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell migration plays a central role in numerous physiological and pathological processes and emerges from the coordinated interplay between intracellular force generation, adhesion dynamics, and mechanical interactions with the environment. A minimal, mechanistically grounded understanding of these processes is required to disentangle the respective contributions of cell-intrinsic and environmental cues. Here, a two-dimensional in silico cell motility model is introduced to describe mesenchymal migration driven by intracellular traction forces generated within actin-rich protrusions anchored to a substrate. The model explicitly accounts for adhesion nucleation, maturation, force buildup and rupture, and relies on a small set of physically interpretable parameters. A systematic mechanical analysis identifies parameter regimes that permit effective cell translocation and delineates conditions leading to stalled or mobile cells. Within motile regimes, the model reproduces a broad spectrum of cell morphologies and migratory behaviours. In particular, cell trajectories exhibit the statistical features of a persistent random walk, with a crossover from ballistic to diffusive motion that arises solely from adhesion dynamics and force balance, without imposing polarization or directional bias. Cell morphology is shown to strongly regulate migration speed, persistence, and pausing behaviour. Altogether, this model provides a minimal reference framework for cell migration on non-deformable substrates and establishes a baseline for future studies of mechanically driven guidance. By construction, it is well suited for extension to deformable fibrous substrates, where cell-induced matrix remodeling and stiffness feedback are expected to bias migration and regulate cell encounters relevant to tissue morphogenesis and anastomosis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.9%
2
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.9%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.7%
4
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.8%
8
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.5%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
12
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
13
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
14
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
20
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
24
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Cytoskeleton
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%