Back

Functional Cell-Type Identification in Neuronal Networks Using High-Density Microelectrode Arrays

Hornauer, P.; Dodi, L. D.; Lin, H.-C.; Gaenswein, T.; Pascual-Garcia, M.; Schroeter, M.; Hierlemann, A.

2026-05-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.30.721923 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The reliable identification of neuronal cell types - in particular, the distinction of excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) neurons on the basis of extracellular recordings without post-hoc immunostaining or genetic labeling - remains a key challenge in neural-circuit analysis. High-density microelectrode arrays (HD-MEAs) have emerged as a powerful tool to address this issue, enabling simultaneous single-cell and network-level electrophysiology. Here, we present two complementary strategies for establishing cell-type ground truth based on HD-MEA recordings: (i) chemogenetic interneuron activation to label putative inhibitory neurons according to their functional response, and (ii) controlled mixing of excitatory and inhibitory hiPSC-derived populations at defined ratios. A classifier combining action potential waveform morphology and autocorrelogram-based discharge dynamics achieves robust cell-type discrimination in in vitro recordings of rat primary cortical cultures and hiPSC-derived networks, as well as in in vivo recordings of rat and mouse - i.e., across several species, recording modalities, and preparation types. Applied to unlabeled data, the classifier reveals cell-type-specific network dynamics during bursts, including an inhibition activity signature preceding burst onsets. Leveraging the HD-MEA spatiotemporal resolution, label-free electrophysiological footprint reconstruction enables a morphological characterization of putative E and I neurons without post-hoc staining. The classification pipeline represents a scalable framework for functional cell-type phenotyping with broad relevance for precision neural-circuit analysis and disease modeling.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.