Back

Differences in substrate engagement and Retinoblastoma protein (RB) binding of human KDM5A and KDM5B

Ruengeler, T. L.; Pavlenko, E. A.; Basler, F.; Renn, J.; Kaschani, F.; Derichs, M.-A.; Zirden, L. C.; Hommel, A.; Kaiser, M.; Roesch, A.; Poepsel, S.

2026-05-02 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.04.30.721888 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Trimethylation of lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4me3) is a post-translational modification (PTM) enriched at promoters of actively transcribed genes. H3K4me3 is removed by the human histone demethylases of the KDM5 family. KDM5 demethylases act as transcriptional repressors through their catalytic activity in addition to more complex roles that depend on their interactions with other chromatin regulators and may be independent of demethylase activity. To better understand the mechanistic differences of the closely related paralogs KDM5A and KDM5B as well as their interactions with Retinoblastoma protein (RB), we systematically analyzed and compared their demethylase activities, nucleosome engagement, and RB binding. We used recombinant nucleosome binding and demethylase activity assays, as well as an integrative structural biology approach using negative-stain electron microscopy (EM), AlphaFold predictions, and cross-linking mass spectrometry for a comprehensive in vitro analysis of these critical and largely non-redundant enzymes. KDM5A and KDM5B showed differences in enzyme kinetics using peptide substrates, as well as in nucleosome binding. Furthermore, KDM5A interacts with RB, mainly mediated by its canonical LxCxE RB binding motif. KDM5B, on the other hand, lacks an LxCxE binding motif and does not stably bind to RB under the conditions tested here. RB directly interacts with nucleosomes, and its nucleosome binding does not measurably affect KDM5A demethylase activity or nucleosome interactions. Our findings provide a biochemical framework for the differences between KDM5A and KDM5B regarding RB interactions and nucleosome engagement.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
2
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
5
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.2%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
12
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.3%
14
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.8%
17
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
18
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
21
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
23
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%