Back

Systems modeling identifies phenotype-determining signaling pathways controlled by phosphatase PTPRJ in diverse receptor tyrosine kinase activation settings

Hart, W. S.; Knight, K. M.; Rizzo, S.; Lee, S. H.; Fetter, R.; Thevenin, D.; Lazzara, M. J.

2026-05-04 systems biology
10.64898/2026.04.30.721884 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor J (PTPRJ) restrains cell proliferation and migration by dephosphorylating receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). PTPRJ is a purported tumor suppressor, and alterations to its expression and/or function are associated with colorectal, breast, lung, and other cancers. While there is interest in controlling PTPRJ-regulated phenotypes, efforts are limited by the complexity of PTPRJ-mediated signaling. PTPRJ dephosphorylates multiple RTKs, and the degree to which PTPRJ control of signaling and phenotypes depends on local cellular RTK activation profiles is unknown. To probe the context dependence of PTPRJ signaling regulation, we collected signaling measurements across 16 pathway nodes at two time points in a panel of HSC3 carcinoma cells engineered with different PTPRJ expression profiles. Cells were treated with three different RTK ligands, and paired phenotype measurements (viability, wound healing, xCELLigence cell index) were made. Partial least squares regression models were developed to predict relationships between PTPRJ-regulated signaling pathways and cell phenotypes. The model effectively separated contributions to variance arising from the PTPRJ expression background and growth factor context. In testing model predictions, we demonstrated that PTPRJ suppressed MET-induced cell cell proliferation via regulation of a HER3/AKT signaling axis that stabilized PTPRJ expression through an unanticipated feedback mechanism. We also found that PTPRJ regulated HSC3 cell migration via JNK signaling that was preferentially activated by MET. Our results identify new regulatory nodes through which PTPRJ influences cancer cell phenotypes and demonstrates that these processes preferentially occur in the context of distinct RTK activation states.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
12.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.0%
3
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
5
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
6
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.1%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
10
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
13
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.2%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
19
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%